The Commerce Department issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on polyethylene film, sheet and strip from China (A-570-924) (here). These final results will be used to set final assessments of AD duties on importers for entries from Nov. 1, 2012 through Oct. 31, 2013 exported by the four companies under review.
The Commerce Department issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on hand trucks and parts thereof from China (A-570-891) (here). Commerce determined the only remaining company under review, New-Tec Integration (Xiamen) Co., Ltd., did not undersell subject merchandise during the period of review, assigning it a zero percent AD duty rate. Subject merchandise from New-Tec entered between Dec. 1, 2012 and Nov. 30, 2013 will be liquidated without any assessment of AD duties, and future entries of subject merchandise exported by New-Tec will not be subject to AD duty cash deposit requirements until further notice. Changes to cash deposit rates from these final results take effect June 11.
The Commerce Department published notices in the June 9 Federal Register on the following AD/CV duty proceedings (any notices that announce changes to AD/CV duty rates, scope, affected firms, or effective dates will be detailed in another ITT article):
The International Trade Commission published notices in the June 9 Federal Register on the following AD/CV injury, Section 337 patent, and other trade proceedings (any notices that warrant a more detailed summary will be in another ITT article):
The Commerce Department issued the final results of its antidumping duty administrative review on steel nails from the United Arab Emirates (A-520-804) (here). For entries on or after June 9, Commerce is setting a 18.13% AD duty cash deposit rate for Dubai Wire FZE. It is also setting a new 184.41% AD duty cash deposit rate for Presision Fasteners LLC. All other exporters of subject merchandise will continue to get the cash deposit rate set for them in their most recently completed review, and companies that have never been assigned an AD duty rate will get the 4.3% all others rate.
The Commerce Department issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review on circular welded non-alloy steel pipe from South Korea (A-580-809) (here). These final results will be used to set final assessments of AD duties on importers for entries from Nov. 1, 2012 through Oct. 31, 2013.
The Commerce Department issued the preliminary results of its antidumping duty administrative review on narrow woven ribbon with woven selvedge from China (A-570-952) (here). The agency said the only company under review, Yama Ribbons Co., Ltd., had no exports of subject merchandise to the U.S. during the period of review. If Commerce's no shipments finding for Yama is confirmed in the final results, subject merchandise from the company will continue to enter at the most recent AD rate set for the company.
The Commerce Department issued the preliminary results of an antidumping duty administrative review of aluminum extrusions from China (C-570-968) (here). This review covers entries from exporters under review for the period Jan. 1, 2013 through Dec. 31, 2013.
The Commerce Department published notices in the June 8 Federal Register on the following AD/CV duty proceedings (any notices that announce changes to AD/CV duty rates, scope, affected firms, or effective dates will be detailed in another ITT article):
The Commerce Department issued the preliminary results of its antidumping duty administrative review on purified carboxymethylcellulose from the Netherlands (A-421-811) (here). The agency preliminarily calculated a zero percent AD rate for Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals, B.V. If the agency's finding is continued in the final results, importers of subject merchandise from Akzo Nobel entered between July 2013 and June 2014 will not be assessed AD duties, and future entries from Akzo Nobel will not be subject to an AD cash deposit requirement until further notice. For now, the most recent final AD rate calculated for each exporter of subject merchandise is still applicable. Any changes would take effect on the date of publication in the Federal Register of the final results of this review, which are due in October.