Section 301 tariffs raised IBM's sourcing costs by tens of millions of dollars, and on Dec. 2 the company asked the incoming administration to “immediately” remove the tariffs on tech inputs such as mechanical parts, fans, power distribution units, power supplies, cables and printed circuit board assemblies. “A limited, early removal of the most counter-productive of the China tariffs could provide relief for U.S. manufacturing, while leaving the new Administration space to negotiate further tariff changes based on Chinese market access commitments,” said Alan Kohlscheen, IBM's import compliance executive, and Michael DiPaula-Coyle, IBM's director of international trade policy.
Section 301 (too broad)
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Nov. 23-29:
The Coalition for a Prosperous America published advice to the transitioning Joe Biden administration, which includes a call to continue and intensify the kind of tariff and sanctions policies used by the Trump administration, and to go further, such as by raising the bound tariffs at the World Trade Organization. The CPA also asked for countrywide withhold release orders for forced labor, a reduction of the $800 de minimis level and a change in the makeup of the Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee. “The membership of COAC should equal representation by domestic businesses and labor harmed by unlawful imports, rather than being dominated by multinationals and importer interests,” they said.
International Trade Today is providing readers with the top stories from Nov. 23-27 in case they were missed. All articles can be found by searching on the titles or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
A Finding Nemo story and picture book doesn't meet the classification requirements for heading 4903, which covers “Children’s picture, drawing or coloring books,” CBP said in a Sept. 15 ruling. CBP previously ruled that the book wasn't classifiable as a children's book and the company, Phidal Publishing in Montreal, requested reconsideration of that ruling. CBP's earlier ruling found the book to be classifiable in heading 4901 for “printed books.”
Just as the recent flood of Section 301 litigation had appeared to slow to a trickle, importers added more than two dozen more lawsuits last week to the multitude of cases currently before the Court of International Trade. But while the new complaints restate the same arguments made by thousands of other plaintiffs in the sprawling litigation, many of the new cases differ in that they seek to invalidate only List 4 tariffs, excluding List 3 from the requests.
With President-elect Joe Biden said to be reluctant to commit to changing 25% tariffs on $250 million worth of imports from China, a recent Congressional Research Service report contains suggestions that could point to a possible off-ramp. The report, released Nov. 23, says that Section 301 actions terminate automatically after four years, unless the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative receives a request for continuation, and conducts a review that determines the tariffs should continue.
International Trade Today is providing readers with the top stories from Nov. 16-20 in case they were missed. All articles can be found by searching on the titles or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Nov. 16-22:
Parties wishing to appear at a Dec. 29 online hearing on alleged Vietnamese currency manipulation must make a request to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative by Dec. 10, including a testimony summary. The Section 301 investigation will examine how the intervention in exchange rates in Vietnam burdens American commerce. After the hearing, rebuttals can be submitted until 11:59 p.m. Jan. 7, 2021.