A bill was reintroduced that would require Congressional approval for any White-House initiated tariff change -- effectively curtailing future Section 201, 301 and Section 232 tariffs, as well as a not-yet-used authority to raise tariffs on all goods from a country where we run a trade deficit.
Section 301 (too broad)
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer told one Democrat the agency would be starting a Section 301 exclusion process for the largest, third tranche of goods subject to tariffs by the end of April (see 1905020030), but he avoided committing to finishing evaluations of pending exclusions once tariffs are lifted. "USTR will consider all options in the event tariff rates are modified," he wrote to Rep. Jackie Walorski, R-Ind. No exclusion process has launched, even though the April 30 target has passed. USTR's spokeswoman did not respond to a question by press time about when it might launch. All of Lighthizer's responses were posted April 24 as an addendum to the February hearing's transcript.
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said there will be an exclusion process for the third tranche of Section 301 tariffs on products from China and that the agency has "begun preparations to launch a process by the end of the month." His comment came in written replies submitted in recent weeks to Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., after a House Ways and Means Committee appearance in February. He had previously argued no exclusions were needed for the 10 percent tariffs despite urging from Congress.
The International Trade Commission recently posted Revision 3 to the 2019 Harmonized Tariff Schedule. The new version includes changes necessary to implement the latest group of exemptions from Section 301 tariffs on certain products from China, as announced by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative in a notice issued April 18 (see 1904170038). That includes the addition of new subheading 9903.88.07 for goods that qualify for the exemption, as well as new paragraph (j) of Note 20 to subchapter III of chapter 99, which lists goods covered by the new exemptions.
International Trade Today is providing readers with some of the top stories for April 22-26 in case they were missed.
UPS, “like most other U.S. multinationals,” advocates for “fair and balanced trade,” CEO David Abney said on a Q1 earnings call April 25. The China-U.S. trade “uncertainty” is “prompting softer industry forecasts” in the Asia-Pacific region, he said. “We certainly encourage leaders of the two countries to find solutions that support increased two-way trade,” and also “assuring that many U.S. companies have access to export to China,” he said. Some UPS customers “have adjusted their supply chain” to mitigate the higher costs of the Section 301 tariffs and retaliatory Chinese duties, and to “adapt to changing trade dynamics,” he said. China economically “is still strong, maybe not as strong as in previous years,” he said. There are “a lot of developments” taking place in two-way trade between the U.S. and China, but also between “China and the rest of the world,” he said. That “sometimes gets lost in the China-U.S. discussions,” he said. “We think it gives us plenty of opportunities to focus and to apply our strategic imperatives” in e-commerce, he said. “We feel good about the economy for the rest of the year.”
The Senate Finance Committee chairman said that both China and the U.S. will step down Section 301 tariffs and the retaliatory tariffs in phases, with each side lifting the tariff at roughly the same time if they believe the other side is complying with a trade deal in good faith. He said the reductions will probably be done in tranches. "Over how long a period of time, I don't know," Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, told reporters on a call on April 24. "But there won't be a 100 percent reduction of tariffs on the day the agreement's signed."
Though the Trump administration postponed indefinitely raising the 10 percent Section 301 tariffs on Chinese goods to 25 percent, iRobot, even “at the 10 percent level,” anticipates incurring $20 million to $25 million in tariff costs for 2019, Chief Financial Officer Alison Dean said on a Q1 earnings call April 24. IRobot argued unsuccessfully last summer for removing duties on the finished vacuum cleaners it imports from China under the 8508.11.00 tariff line on grounds the duties would hurt the company and that robotic vacuums are not an “industrially significant technology in China.”
Tool sets imported from China by the Apex Tool Group can be hit with multiple Section 301 tariffs, CBP said in an April 10 ruling. As was the case in a September 2018 ruling involving Apex (see 1810100040), the tool set is classified based on the article subject to the highest rate of duty under General Rule of Interpretation 1. CBP ruled that the tool sets are dutiable at a 38.9% rate.
International Trade Today is providing readers with some of the top stories for April 15-19 in case they were missed.