The International Trade Commission published notices in the Sept. 6 Federal Register on the following AD/CV injury, Section 337 patent, and other trade proceedings (any notices that warrant a more detailed summary will appear in another ITT article):
Russia export controls and sanctions
The use of export controls and sanctions on Russia has surged since the country's invasion of Crimea in 2014, and especially its invasion of Ukraine in in February 2022. Similar export controls and sanctions have been imposed by U.S. allies, including the EU, U.K. and Japan. The following is a listing of recent articles in Export Compliance Daily on export controls and sanctions imposed on Russia:
The U.S. International Trade Commission will do a full five-year review of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal from Russia (Inv. No. 731-TA-991 (Second Review)), after a vote last week, it said. The "sunset" review is to decide whether revocation of the order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury, it said.
Antidumping duty investigations on ferrosilicon from Russia and Venezuela will continue, after the International Trade Commission voted Aug. 30 that dumped imports of the product may be hurting U.S. industry. A coalition of U.S. manufacturers and labor unions requested the duties in July, alleging underselling by Russia and Venezuela is cutting profits and causing unemployment (see 13072304). AD and CV duty cash deposit requirements may come into effect as soon as Dec. 26, when Commerce is scheduled to makes its preliminary determination, although that deadline may be extended.
On Sept. 2-3, the Foreign Agricultural Service posted the following GAIN reports:
On Aug. 29, the Foreign Agricultural Service posted the following GAIN reports:
Uralchem’s NS 30:7 fertilizer is subject to antidumping duties under the order on ammonium nitrate from Russia (A-821-811), said the Commerce Department Aug. 6 in a final scope ruling. Uralchem argued the fertilizer is not an ammonium nitrate product, citing testimony and other evidence it gave Commerce. But Commerce said the “(k)(1)” factors like the petition, records the investigation, and prior scope determinations were enough to find the fertilizer in scope, so examination of any other factors like Uralchem’s evidence would have gone against its regulations.
On Aug. 27, the Foreign Agricultural Service posted the following GAIN reports:
The International Trade Commission published notices in the Aug. 26 Federal Register on the following AD/CV injury, Section 337 patent, and other trade proceedings (any notices that warrant a more detailed summary will appear in another ITT article):
A listing of recent antidumping and countervailing duty messages from the Commerce Department posted to CBP's website Aug. 22, along with the case number(s) and CBP message number, is provided below. The messages are available by searching for the listed CBP message number at addcvd.cbp.gov. (CBP occasionally adds backdated messages without otherwise indicating which message was added. ITT will include a message date in parentheses in such cases.)
On Aug. 22, the Foreign Agricultural Service posted the following GAIN reports: