A Chinese freight forwarder illegally tried to change the terms of its signed service contract with a U.S. distributor and purposefully delayed 20 container shipments so it could submit higher detention and demurrage invoices, the American company said in a complaint this month to the Federal Maritime Commission. Indiana distributor Way Interglobal also said China-based Shenzhen Unifelix, a von-vessel operating common carrier, “improperly” disclosed Way’s financial information to Shenzhen’s vendors to try to force Way into agreeing to a new contract.
Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
Globerunners, a California-based shipper, said Texas-based Hoyer Global may have overcharged it in wharfage fees for a container held for years at a South Korean port. In a complaint this month to the Federal Maritime Commission, Globerunners said Hoyer never provided it with a copy of the detention and demurrage invoice Hoyer was given by the South Korean port. Globerunners believes Hoyer passed along fees higher than what the South Korean port charged.
A recently signed California law will “significantly” limit the ability of marine container providers or terminals to impose detention and demurrage charges, law firm Cozen O’Connor said in an alert this month. The law, effective Jan. 1, outlines 10 situations in which container providers will not be able to begin or continue free time or impose fees on motor carriers and cargo owners “due to circumstances ostensibly beyond those parties’ control,” the firm said.
The Federal Maritime Commission this week officially sent its proposed rule on demurrage and detention billing requirements to the Federal Register (see 2210070079). Public comments on the rule are due Dec. 13.
CORONADO, Calif. – The Federal Maritime Commission needs industry input into key provisions of its newly announced detention and demurrage proposed rule (see 2210070079), and in particular on a provision limiting charges only to parties that have a contractual relationship, said Lucille Marvin, FMC managing director, during a panel discussion Oct. 8 at the Western Cargo Conference.
The Federal Maritime Commission released a notice of proposed rulemaking further refining prohibited practices for demurrage and detention, which is required under the Ocean Shipping Reform Act (OSRA).
Flexport violated the Shipping Act when it failed to include required information on more than $100,000 worth of detention and demurrage charge invoices, Indiana-based Philip Reinisch Co. said in a recent complaint to the Federal Maritime Commission. Philip Reinisch said the FMC should order Flexport to refund more than $55,000 in paid invoices, award it damages for the “wrongful withholding” of containers and nullify nearly $50,000 in outstanding charges.
The Federal Maritime Commission has received nearly 100 charge complaints and numerous questions related to the Ocean Shipping Reform Act since its enactment earlier this year, FMC official Lucille Marvin said during a Sept. 21 FMC meeting. She also said the agency is making progress on a range of OSRA provisions and other agency priorities, including one that will result in a set of best practices for chassis pools and another that will formally propose new demurrage and detention billing requirements.
The Federal Maritime Commission should issue an emergency order requiring carriers and terminal operators to share more information on cargo availability with shippers and other carriers, more than a dozen motor carriers and logistics companies said. The companies, most of which move freight at the Port of New York and New Jersey, said inadequate information sharing has created an emergency that is hurting their operations and restricting cargo from moving efficiently.