Industry officials expect a unanimous FCC vote Thursday to approve a draft item that would create a new emergency alert system code for law enforcement officers in danger, but they left open the possibility one of the agency’s Democrats could vote against it. Those inside and outside the FCC told us the relatively noncontroversial Blue Alert item isn’t their main focus at a commissioners' meeting that also will feature votes on net neutrality (see 1712130053) and the national broadcast coverage ownership cap (see 1712060051). The draft order hasn’t been the target of many suggested edits and has changed little since being released, an FCC official said.
A higher percentage of emergency alert system participants received the alert signal during the 2017 national EAS test (see 1709270071) than in 2016, but more than 1,000 fewer EAS participants sent their receipt and transmission results to the agency afterward, and more TV stations didn't get the alert and so didn't pass it on, said initial results Thursday from the FCC Public Safety Bureau. “Performance appears to have improved over what we observed in the 2016 nationwide EAS test,” said a public notice. This year, 95.8 percent of test participants successfully received the simulation, vs. 95.4 percent. But 19,069 broadcasters provided information afterward, compared to 20,389. More participants received the alert through the Integrated Public Alert Warning System in 2017, 59.3 percent v. 43.5 percent. Only participants that received the alert through IPAWS were able to send out Spanish-language alerts, and 207 test participants did so in 2017, up from 75 in 2016. The results could change with further analysis, the PN said. “Together with [the Federal Emergency Management Agency], the Bureau will continue to analyze the results of the 2017 nationwide EAS test and release more detailed findings when available.”
A paragraph in the FCC’s draft Blue Alerts order set for the December agenda gives the nod to a change in the way emergency alerts are handled that could have effects beyond the order's creation of a single BLU emergency alert system (EAS) code for law enforcement officers in danger. “We encourage EAS manufacturers and EAS Participants to take technical steps to facilitate the delivery of IPAWS [Integrated Public Alert Warning System]-based EAS Blue Alerts to the public where an alert is first delivered to an EAS Participant via broadcast,” the draft order said, giving EAS participants permission to favor the internet-based, more-information rich common alerting protocol (CAP) alerts over the more simple alerts transmitted by the legacy “daisy-chain” system.
An FCC draft ruling and orders would undo 2015 net neutrality regulation and Title II broadband classification under the Communications Act, as Chairman Ajit Pai and staffers outlined Tuesday (see 1711210020). The 210-page draft declaratory ruling, report and order, and order released Wednesday would "reverse heavy-handed utility-style" broadband regulation "and return to the light-touch framework" that promoted a "free and open internet" before Title II classification, it said.
The Advanced Warning and Response Network (AWARN) Alliance sees the FCC vote authorizing voluntary deployments of ATSC 3.0 (see 1711160060) as laying "the ground work for major improvements in America’s emergency alerting system,” said Executive Director John Lawson. Recent disasters “provide more depressing examples that our current alerting systems are not adequate,” he said. Using 3.0, the alliance and “public safety partners will begin the technical development” of AWARN next year, he said. But Public Knowledge Senior Vice President Harold Feld blasted FCC Chairman Ajit Pai for the vote, calling it an “action that primarily benefits Sinclair Broadcasting at the expense of consumers.” With Sinclair having “boasted” about the audio measurement tools it will develop and patent royalties it will collect from the next-gen standard, the order “does nothing to protect consumer privacy or protect consumers from the extra costs" of the transition, said Feld. Though NCTA was active in docket 16-142 with filings urging 3.0 not impose costs and burdens on cable companies and their customers, the group declined comment Friday on 3.0's approval.
An item now listed as being on circulation concerns streamlining and improving the process for filing state emergency alert system plans, an FCC spokesman said. The draft on circulation is listed only as a Public Safety Bureau item “On the Matter of Amendment of Part 11 of the Commission's Rules Regarding the Emergency Alert System.” There has also been recent activity under that heading in docket 15-94 concerning Blue Alerts (see 1706220045), the proposed addition of an EAS code to warn of law enforcement officers in danger. Bureau staff queried Sage Alerting (see 1711140024) and AT&T about possible timelines for implementing the alerts. The bureau didn’t comment.
Citing AT&T and Verizon's acknowledgement implementation of device-based geotargeting of wireless emergency alerts could be faster, the National Weather Service, Department of Homeland Security and Federal Emergency Management Agency are pushing for that sped-up time frame. The agencies in an FCC docket 15-91 filing posted Wednesday said talks with state and local public safety agencies indicated a wide belief such geotargeting can be achieved in less than the 42-month minimum implementation recommended by the wireless operators. The companies in September said that in meetings with agency staff, they backed the recommendations of a Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council working group that a minimum 42-month timetable is needed for implementation, but said an expedited process is doable. Verizon said that expedited process would first require working group consensus on an appropriate accuracy threshold and if there were sufficient willingness to incorporate geo-fencing capabilities by device manufacturers and operating system providers. AT&T said the coordinate data being sent in the same WEA message would help in expediting implementation. Representatives of CTIA and members are complaining about a recent order upholding a Nov. 1 deadline for the nation’s five largest carriers to be able to provide “clickable” embedded references in WEAs (see 1711020054). The representatives met with Public Safety Bureau Chief Lisa Fowlkes, an aide to Chairman Ajit Pai and a staffer from the Office of General Counsel. AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile and U.S. Cellular had reps there. “The net effect of the Commission’s new interpretation will cause many mobile devices capable of receiving WEA messages to alternate between being considered ‘WEA capable’ depending on the deadline of the Commission’s required WEA enhancements, a device’s ability to be updated through software, and whether consumers choose to exercise the software update,” CTIA said in a document in docket 15-91. “The Commission’s new interpretation risks extensive consumer and public safety community confusion, and unnecessarily complicates … providers’ efforts to inform consumers about WEA capable devices in a nearly continuous fashion.” Carriers “have limited visibility into whether mobile devices are or could be ‘WEA capable’ under this interpretation,” the association said.
Twelve months is enough time for Sage Alerting Systems to create software upgrades that will allow its customers to use the proposed Blue Alert emergency alert system code (see 1706220045), Sage President Harold Price said in response to questions from FCC Public Safety Bureau staff Monday, said an ex parte filing posted the next day in docket 15-94. That’s also enough time to integrate the code into equipment that hasn’t been sold or manufactured, Price said.
The FCC reaffirmed its schedule for geo-targeting of wireless emergency alerts to “best approximate” the target area, and said the nation’s five largest carriers have to provide “clickable” embedded references by Nov. 1. It said smaller carriers must still meet the same geo-targeting requirement as their larger peers but will get an extra 18 months to meet the embedded messages requirement. The order was released about 8 p.m. Wednesday, the deadline day.
That the FCC isn't seeking new comments ahead of the vote on its draft media ownership order on reconsideration is unlikely to present a problem in approving the rules or defending them in court, supporters and opponents of the proposed changes (see 1710260049) told us. The agency received public input on the original 2014 quadrennial review order and on the petition for reconsideration that's the basis for the draft recon order, said Georgetown Law Institute for Public Representation Senior Counselor Andrew Schwartzman. The agency can make rules based on that record, said Schwartzman, who's involved in litigation against FCC ownership rules. Demonstrating a basis for the rule changes and that they represent a logical outgrowth from the original order and petition for recon likely will be part of the FCC’s defense against a very likely court challenge, said an official formerly in the Office of General Counsel.