The FCC Public Safety Bureau granted Paramount Global’s request for a 30-day extension, until Jan. 10, of the agency’s requirement that emergency alert system participants update their equipment to be able to prioritize alerts delivered by common alerting protocol by Dec. 12, said an order in Friday’s Daily Digest. Paramount requested the extension for 29 stations that had been affected by vendor delays (see 2312120039). “Based on the circumstances described herein, we conclude there is good cause to provide” the extension, said the order.
FCC rules went into effect Friday for commercial mobile service providers that elected to participate in the wireless emergency alert message system in the 13 most commonly spoken languages in the U.S. as well as English and American Sign Language (see 2310190056), said a notice in Friday’s Federal Register.
The FCC Public Safety Bureau granted GCI Cable’s request for a temporary waiver of the requirement -- enacted in September 2022 -- that emergency alert system participants update their equipment to be able to prioritize alerts delivered by common alerting protocol by Tuesday, said an order in that day’s Daily Digest. Alerts delivered via the internet-based CAP can provide richer text information and are more accessible than those delivered via the legacy EAS system. GCI said it discovered that several of its EAS encoders are unable to process the required software update and that supply chain issues have delayed delivery of new encoders. “We conclude there is good cause to provide an extension of time until March 11, 2024, to accommodate the anticipated hardware delivery and installation estimated by GCI,” the bureau order said. Paramount Global requested a similar 30-day extension of the deadline for three of its 29 stations for similar reasons, a petition for temporary waiver posted Tuesday in docket 15-94 said. “The Paramount Global Licensees are fully committed to the expeditious installation and operation of their new EAS equipment well within the 30-day period requested.”
The FCC Tuesday approved a request by NAB and low-power FM entity REC for a 90-day extension (see 2311150068), until March 11, the deadline for a change to broadcaster emergency alerting operations. The extension applies only to companies working with Sage Alerting Systems, which caused problems cited in the waiver request, an order from the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau said. The deadline for other broadcasters remains Dec. 12. NAB and REC complained Sage won't be able to release a required firmware update “necessary to make the Commission’s promulgated changes until shortly before the December compliance deadline,” the bureau said: “We are persuaded that Sage’s delay in delivering the necessary update is beyond the control of EAS Participants and will impede its customers’ ability to meet” the deadline. “We deny, however, the Extension Request to the extent it requests a waiver on behalf of all EAS Participants,” the bureau said.
Guam Cellular and Paging will continue opting out of participating in the wireless emergency alert system, parent DoCoMo Pacific said Friday in a filing posted in docket 15-91. “DoCoMo reserves its right to change its election at a later date, in accordance with the Commission’s regulations,” the filing said. Vermont’s VTel Wireless also is opting out, although it “intends to participate in the provision of WEA in the near future," as is Texas provider Tampnet.
NAB and low-power FM entity REC Networks want the FCC to extend by 90 days, until March 11, the deadline for a change to broadcaster emergency alerting operations. “Simply put, it is already too late" for many emergency alert system participants to meet the current deadline, said NAB and REC in an ex parte filing posted Wednesday in docket 15-94. Broadcasters currently have until Dec. 12 to update their EAS systems to comply with an FCC requirement from September 2022 that they prioritize alerts delivered by the Internet-based common alerting protocol over analog alerts delivered via the broadcast-based daisy-chain (see 2209290017). Alerts delivered via CAP have fuller text and multiple language options, making them more accessible. Sage Alerting, a major EAS equipment manufacturer, announced earlier this month that it won’t be prepared to push out the needed update until shortly before the deadline. “We have made the FCC aware that the update has taken us longer to produce than we had anticipated, and that there will be insufficient time for many of our users to install the update by the December 12, 2023 deadline,” said the Sage website. Smaller broadcasters use contract engineers to implement this sort of update, and the limited supply of such engineers, Sage’s delay, and the impending holidays will prevent many broadcasters from meeting the deadline, NAB and REC said. “Granting this extension request will not reduce EAS functionality because EAS Participants will continue to be able to process EAS messages as they do today, without any disruption or impairment,” according to the filing.
The FCC should immediately cease using nationwide wireless emergency alerts of the type tested Oct. 4 (see 2310040071), said Jimmy Patronis, Florida chief financial officer and state fire marshal in a letter to Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel Monday. Patronis posted the letter on X and also issued it as a news release. “What was the point of that? Was it really necessary?” Patronis wrote about the nationwide WEA test. “The federal government scared about 70% of Americans with that alert, and in my opinion, this was government overreach at its finest.” Patronis characterized the WEA alert as a “DM” (direct message, such as those used by social media apps) in the letter, and said the alert test made “Big Tech” and “Big Government” seem to be “indistinguishable.” “There is absolutely zero reason that the federal government needs to notify millions of Americans at the exact same moment,” wrote Patronis. “It’s unreasonable that people on the West Coast need to be alerted about something going on in the East Coast.” Nationwide alerts exist to provide warning of a massive emergency event that could affect large swaths of the country, such as a large-scale nuclear missile strike, alerting officials have told us. They have also said that tests of the warning system are necessary to ensure that it will work when it is needed, similar to the local alerting tests commonly performed by broadcast stations around the country. “State Emergency Management Directors are more than capable of protecting and alerting their own citizens during emergencies without the federal government needlessly getting in the way,” wrote Patronis. “I urge you as the Chairwoman of the FCC and a fellow taxpayer to immediately halt any further utilization of the National Wireless Emergency Alert System.” "Life-saving emergency alert systems are the law, as is the requirement" that the Federal Emergency Management Agency "conduct periodic nationwide tests and they are responsible for setting the date and time of these tests," emailed an FCC spokesperson. "The FCC strongly supports emergency alerting, which saves lives in communities across the country."
Broadcasters, wireless companies and alerting equipment manufacturers are concerned about the potential costs of increasing cybersecurity regulations on emergency alerting participants and the burden of potentially duplicated reporting requirements across multiple federal agencies, they told the FCC and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Monday at a public roundtable event on alerting cybersecurity. The event included local government public safety agencies, the FBI and cybersecurity companies and featured discussion of potential threats to alerting infrastructure and the need for transparency around cyberattacks alongside potential regulatory burdens. “WEA is a voluntary program,” said CCIA General Counsel Angela Simpson. “There is a straw that will break the proverbial camel’s back at some point.”
An online survey of how respondents received the Oct. 4 nationwide emergency alert test shows AM radio isn’t the most effective way to disseminate alerts, said CTA in a post on X Thursday. The survey -- done online by CTA over two days among 800 adults -- shows 92% of U.S. adults received the Oct. 4 emergency alert test via their smart phones, 5% heard it on FM radio and 1% on AM radio, CTA said. “Thrilled to unveil new @CTATech research that debunks the myth that #AMradio is the most effective emergency alerting system,” said the post from CTA Policy Affairs Manager India Herdman. CTA said the test shows Congress shouldn’t mandate inclusion of AM radios in automobiles. "Rather than rely on a survey following an EAS test made under ideal circumstances, one should look at the countless real-world examples of broadcast radio providing lifesaving information when all other communications networks -- including and especially wireless networks -- go down," said an NAB spokesperson. NAB has championed legislation requiring AM on the basis of its effectiveness at emergency alerting (see 2305260034. Wireless alerts during disasters often direct recipients to their local news outlets, which are often broadcasters, for emergency information, NAB said.
The three major wireless carriers told the FCC the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Oct. 4 wireless emergency alert had relatively few problems (see 2310040071), in filings posted Thursday in docket 15-91, though each reported some glitches. T-Mobile said repeatedly it had no difficulties receiving FEMA’s integrated public alert and warning system (IPAWS) alert. Test alert messages broadcast via LTE, UMTS and GSM “were transmitted 14.411 seconds after receipt from FEMA IPAWS due to mapping requirements imposed on these three broadcast technologies by the significantly larger database underlying T-Mobile’s nationwide coverage footprint,” the carrier said: “This represents an improvement of over 20 seconds from the 2021 test. Test Alert Messages broadcast via 5G were transmitted in under one (1) second.” T-Mobile also observed “an anomaly” for subscribers using some handsets running the Android R or newer operating system (OS). “Affected devices had the device language set to English but presented the alert in both English and Spanish,” T-Mobile said: “The anomaly was caused by an inadvertent overwrite of the logic in the device OS by the OS vendor, affecting National Alerts. T-Mobile is not aware of an instance in which this anomaly delayed or prevented receipt of the Test Alert Message.” Verizon said the system largely worked. Verizon had a delay of 1.663 seconds between the receipt of the test alert message from FEMA IPAWS and transmission to subscribers. “Verizon does not consider this a ‘delay,’ ‘complication,’ or ‘anomaly,’” it said: “The processing time between receipt of the alert and transmission to subscribers simply results from the large number of cell sites in our network, and the need for the two mated [cell broadcast entities] facilities to efficiently coordinate the delivery of both the English and Spanish language versions of the alert across all those sites.” Verizon also reported complaints and inquiries to its customer care channels that indicated “some cases where subscribers may not have received the alert due to the local RF propagation environment, or where the user’s device was operating in Wi-Fi mode only.” AT&T said some customers in Texas didn’t receive an alert, because of a fiber cut affecting 30 cellsites. “AT&T did not observe any instances of excessive delay in the network and does not consider the lapse of one second between the receipt of the alert from IPAWS and the transmission of the alert to subscribers as in any way delayed or abnormal,” it said. AT&T also said it surveyed more than 1,000 employees about their experience: More than 99.3% “received and reviewed the English version of the alert,” 85% “received and reviewed the alert within 1 minute or less. And 90% … received and reviewed the alert within 3 minutes or less.” AT&T also worked with a handset vendor in four states to test the alert on 77 handsets. “Of these, 100% of the devices received the English version of the alert and 97.4% of these devices received the test alert within 1 minute,” AT&T said. Also, 42 of the devices “were enabled to receive Spanish alerts and 100% of the devices received the alert in Spanish and 100% of these devices received the alert within [one] minute.”