LOS ANGELES -- Nyko Technologies took the wraps off several Shield, Xbox One and PS4 accessories at E3 this week. For the Shield, it will ship a dock at about $39.99, a $19.99 travel case and $29.99 shell case, said Marketing Director Chris Arbogast. Nyko expects to ship them for the device’s launch this month, he said.
CEA and NCTA have asked the Department of Energy to pause a rulemaking process on energy standards for set-top boxes and instead allow multichannel video program distributors to police themselves, the trade groups said at a joint media briefing Monday. Davis Wright attorney Paul Glist, representing NCTA, said he believes DOE proposals (CD April 10 p19) on whether set-top boxes should be regulated and how they should be tested could be finalized soon. If so, they would be a “switch point” for the cable industry, he said. If the DOE continues with the rulemaking, it will invalidate a voluntary agreement (VA) on set-top box standards that’s already being followed industry-wide, and discourage other industries from working proactively on energy efficiency, “undermining the very thing the DOE wants to encourage,” he said. DOE and the National Resources Defense Council, which backed tighter standards on set-top boxes, didn’t comment.
CEA and NCTA have asked the Department of Energy to pause a rulemaking process on energy standards for set-top boxes and instead allow multichannel video program distributors to police themselves, the trade groups said at a joint media briefing Monday. Davis Wright attorney Paul Glist, representing NCTA, said he believes DOE proposals (CED April 10 p4) on whether set-top boxes should be regulated and how they should be tested could be finalized soon. If so, they would be a “switch point” for the cable industry, he said. If the DOE continues with the rulemaking, it will invalidate a voluntary agreement (VA) on set-top box standards that’s already being followed industry-wide, and discourage other industries from working proactively on energy efficiency, “undermining the very thing the DOE wants to encourage,” he said. DOE and the National Resources Defense Council, which backed tighter standards on set-top boxes, didn’t comment.
The media ownership study that prompted a pause in approving FCC rules may be done soon, said the head of the group paying for the research on cross-ownership’s impact on minority ownership. The research has been completed and is being peer-reviewed, Minority Media and Telecommunications Council Executive Director David Honig told us Tuesday. “We're hoping to get it finished and published before the end of this week, but you never know,” he said. “It’s that close to done.” Then-FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski in February paused a vote on ownership rules to give time for MMTC to do the study, and Friday the agency released a study design on barriers to entry, research that a public notice said relates to ownership rules (CD May 29 p2). MMTC had expected the research to be given to the agency Wednesday, said a May 2 filing in docket 09-182 (http://bit.ly/12iVzVE). It said the reviewers are professors Philip Napoli of Fordham University, Allen Hammond of the Santa Clara School of Law and Jannette Dates, ex-dean of Howard University’s School of Communications. NAB continues to think “modest reform of media ownership rules -- many of which stem from the 1970s -- are warranted,” an association spokesman told us. “As the events of Superstorm Sandy, the Boston Marathon bombing and the Oklahoma tornadoes have proven, local broadcasting still matters, and it’s time to adopt ownership rules that allow radio and TV stations to remain competitive with national pay media providers.”
The FCC, having contracted for $208,799 of preliminary research on barriers to entering businesses it oversees like owning radio and TV stations, may spend as much as $917,823 for studies acquiring new data including on new media. That’s according to documents the agency released to Communications Daily’s publisher under Freedom of Information Act requests. As the commission prepares to receive a new privately funded study on media ownership for which a vote on new rules was paused in February (CD Feb 27 p1), it’s embarking on what officials inside and outside the agency called the next phase of barriers-to-entry research.
The FCC, having contracted for $208,799 of preliminary research on barriers to entering businesses it oversees like owning radio and TV stations, may spend as much as $917,823 for studies acquiring new data including on new media. That’s according to documents the agency released to Washington Internet Daily’s publisher under Freedom of Information Act requests. As the commission prepares to receive a new privately funded study on media ownership for which a vote on new rules was paused in February, it’s embarking on what officials inside and outside the agency called the next phase of barriers-to-entry research.
LAS VEGAS -- The second-screen experience is creating a new measurement tool for TV viewing, panelists said Monday at the Parks Associates Connections conference held in conjunction with the CTIA conference. “In the past,” said D.P. Venkatesh, CEO of content discovery company mPortal, audience measuring companies would “tell you what people in America watch.” Now, he said, a new model is emerging based on broadband activity which “lets you know exactly what people are doing.”
LAS VEGAS -- The second-screen experience is creating a new measurement tool for TV viewing, panelists said Monday at the Parks Associates Connections conference held in conjunction with the CTIA conference. “In the past,” said D.P. Venkatesh, CEO of content discovery company mPortal, audience measuring companies would “tell you what people in America watch.” Now, he said, a new model is emerging based on broadband activity which “lets you know exactly what people are doing.”
LAS VEGAS -- The second-screen experience is creating a new measurement tool for TV viewing, panelists said Monday at the Parks Associates Connections conference held in conjunction with the CTIA conference. “In the past,” said D.P. Venkatesh, CEO of content discovery company mPortal, audience measuring companies would “tell you what people in America watch.” Now, he said, a new model is emerging based on broadband activity which “lets you know exactly what people are doing.”
The FCC is requiring all carriers and interconnected text messaging providers to send an automatic bounceback text message to consumers where text-to-911 service is not available, it said in an order released Friday. The order had been adopted May 8 on a 4-0 vote with Commissioner Ajit Pai concurring. The nation’s four largest carriers, Verizon Wireless, AT&T, Sprint Nextel and T-Mobile, have already committed to providing bounceback messages by June 30. The requirement now applies to other carriers and interconnected “over-the-top” text providers by Sept. 30 (http://fcc.us/12PR7sF). “Requiring all CMRS providers and interconnected text providers to implement a bounce-back mechanism is particularly important because while deployment of text-to-911 has begun, the transition is still in the very early stages and will not be uniform,” the order said. “During the transition, text-to-911 will be available in certain geographic areas sooner than it is available in others and may be supported by certain service providers but not by others. At the same time, as text-to-911 becomes more widely available, it is likely to generate increased consumer expectations as to its availability, which makes it increasingly important for consumers to be made aware when it is not available in an emergency.” “For too long, when a call for help went out as a text message, the only response was painful silence,” said Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel. “But no one should be left wondering in an emergency if they have been heard.” Pai’s concurrence notes that he has fundamental questions about the FCC’s jurisdiction arguments. “I cannot support the lengthy legal analysis contained in this item, which offers a grab bag of theories, some far-reaching and questionable,” he said. “For example, the Commission today claims sweeping authority to prescribe ‘rules that prevent the transmission of potentially misleading text messages.’ This remarkable assertion of power raises serious First Amendment questions and should give pause to anyone who has ever sent a ‘potentially misleading’ text message."