Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching for the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
Chip export news
The European Union needs to better coordinate with its member states on potential export controls against China’s chip industry, said Noah Barkin, a Europe-China relations expert with the Rhodium Group. Barkin, speaking during a Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee hearing this week, said the EU is still grappling with how to best impose dual-use export controls and isn’t yet at a place where it can match U.S. restrictions.
Think tank scholars said the World Trade Organization isn't well suited to deal with technology sharing restrictions, but that the G-7 and coordinated bilateral actions have been effective so far.
The U.S. should push the World Trade Organization to end trade-related intellectual property waiver conditions, experts told a House subcommittee this week, saying the waiver may help China acquire sensitive U.S. technologies and leapfrog American innovation in biopharma. Several experts during the hearing suggested the waivers could act as a loophole to U.S. export controls and allow Chinese companies to better compete with the U.S. in the biotechnology industry.
Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching for the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.
The U.S. and its allies should tighten export restrictions on artificial intelligence technologies destined to China, said Rep. Michael Waltz, R-Fla.. Waltz, speaking during a June 5 event hosted by the Atlantic Council, said America and its close trading partners need to “collaborate and innovate within a bubble that can be protected,” adding that cutting off technology trade with China will be inevitable. “I just don't see a way forward without decoupling,” he said.
The Commerce Department should use the Entity List and potentially its anti-boycott regulations to respond to Beijning’s restrictions on U.S. chip company Micron (see 2305220053 and 2305240002), Reps. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, and Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., said in a June 1 letter to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo. The lawmakers said it’s time for the U.S. and its partners to “firmly push back” on China’s “economic coercion, adding that it "can no longer sit on the sidelines as the [People’s Republic of China] selectively targets U.S. and allied entities with the goal of intimidating our businesses and harming our economic security.”
The Bureau of Industry and Security doesn't have a draft rule in place to increase export licensing requirements for Huawei despite rumors this year that new restrictions for the Chinese technology company were imminent, said Thea Kendler, BIS assistant secretary for export administration. Kendler also said the agency has seen a sharp decline in China-related license applications, is spending more time reviewing those applications and is prioritizing reviews of artificial intelligence items, quantum computing technology and biotechnology for new export controls.
The Bureau of Industry and Security has had “more than enough time” to issue a final version of its October China chip export controls, which need to be “strengthened” and “vigorously enforced” to maintain American semiconductor leadership, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said in a May 30 letter to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo. Rubio asked the agency when it plans to issue the final rule, what changes will be made, whether BIS had “delayed” finalizing the rule and more.
U.S. exports of semiconductors to China fell by about $2.9 billion in 2022, “wiping out” growth the industry saw the year before, the U.S.-China Business Council said in a report this week. The decline was partly due to the Biden administration’s sweeping chip controls released in October (see 2210070049), the report said, adding that the “more frequent use of export controls over the last few years has led Chinese customers to deprioritize American products when there are viable domestic and third-country suppliers.”