FCC Chmn. Martin and others are using a “phony crisis” to justify a proposal to change how Universal Service Fund (USF) contributions are collected, the Keep USF Fair Coalition told reporters Mon. The group, which opposes Martin’s proposal of a flat collection method based on telephone numbers, said the current revenue-based method isn’t broken. Coalition Exec. Dir. Maureen Thompson released a report she said “debunks the hoax” that USF collection reform is needed. The report shows the long distance revenue base for USF contributions isn’t dwindling, as opponents argue, Thompson said. According to the report, long distance revenue base, $76.6 billion in 2003, is projected to be $78.9 billion in 2006. Projected revenues drop slightly in 2007 to $76.8 billion -- still slightly over the 2003 level, Thompson said in an audio news conference. If needed, the current revenue base easily could be expanded by making it more “technology neutral,” meaning revenue could be added from VoIP and other advanced technologies not directly contributing to the fund now. If that were done, the expanded revenue base for USF would be $104.5 billion in 2006 and $105.9 billion in 2007, Thompson said, calling that a more “common-sense” approach to enlarging the fund. The coalition opposes a numbers-based system because it might lead to higher fees for low-volume users of long distance service. Although contributions to the fund come from companies that offer long distance service through a percentage of revenue, the firms pass the fees onto users. The coalition’s announcement came on the eve of a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on USF contributions today (Tues.). The Pacific Research Institute (PRI) took advantage of today’s scheduled hearing to issue a call for more sweeping USF change. The think tank said the USF has “spiraled out of control,” giving “wasteful subsidies [to] entrenched local carriers.” Rather than expand USF to include contributions from high-tech services such as VoIP, Congress should target needy consumers with vouchers and add rules that “ensure public accountability and safeguard cutting-edge innovations,” PRI said.

The FCC decision not to act on a Verizon forbearance petition seeking regulatory relief regarding charges to business customers for high-speed data was a win for Verizon -- but how big remains unclear, analysts said Tues. The exact relief provided by the FCC is uncertain because the Commission has released statements and a news release, but no order yet, analysts said.

The FCC decision not to act on a Verizon forbearance petition seeking regulatory relief regarding charges to business customers for high-speed data was a win for Verizon -- but how big remains unclear, analysts said Tues. The exact relief provided by the FCC is uncertain because the Commission has released statements and a news release, but no order yet, analysts said.

A bill introduced by Sen. DeMint (R-S.C.) that would give the FCC authority to define what constitutes fair competition for consumers is based largely on ideas from the Progress & Freedom Foundation’s project on telecom reform. The bill, which has no co-sponsors, includes a substantial section on universal service fund (USF) reform -- the first major Senate telecom bill to address the matter. The provisions are based on research by experts PFF convened from universities, law firms and research groups (CD Dec 9 p3). DeMint’s bill would require the FCC to adopt within 6 months after enactment a new contribution mechanism based on phone numbers; place a $3.6 billion cap on distribution, in the form of performance-based block grants to states.

State lawmakers from across the U.S. will tackle telecom and technology issues this week at the National Conference of State Legislatures’ annual conference in Seattle. Proposed state and national telecom law rewrites and wrangles over municipal Wi-Fi are among the hot topics at the 5-day conference, which begins today (Tues.). About 7,000 state legislators, policy experts, advocates, govt. leaders and media are expected to attend.

State lawmakers from across the U.S. will tackle telecom and technology issues this week at the National Conference of State Legislatures’ annual conference in Seattle. Proposed state and national telecom law rewrites and wrangles over municipal Wi-Fi are among the hot topics at the 5-day conference, which begins today (Tues.). About 7,000 state legislators, policy experts, advocates, govt. leaders and media are expected to attend.

Analysis of Sen. Ensign’s (R-Nev.) telecom bill (CD July 28 p1) is yielding a common refrain: It’s a good start, but the bill won’t pass as is because of controversial provisions affecting cable, CLECs and municipalities, according to interviews with analysts and lobbyists. Furthermore, Senate Commerce Committee Chmn. Stevens (R-Alaska) is planning his own telecom bill, which he has said he'll unveil in the fall after dealing with DTV legislation. Senate sources said Stevens may gauge the response to the Ensign bill as he drafts his own legislation. Others are pessimistic that there will be time to write an omnibus bill.

More than 100 rural telecom executives hit Capitol Hill Tues. to start 2 days of lobbying for universal service and broadband issues as part of an annual event sponsored by OPASTCO. In a morning briefing, OPASTCO staff told rural ILECs Antideficiency Act (ADA) legislation should top their agendas as they visited representatives and senators from their home states.

AT&T CEO David Dorman urged new FCC Chmn. Martin to act quickly on issues hanging over the telecom sector’s business side, including intercarrier compensation reform and the USF’s future. But Dorman, who is expected to be in the number 2 slot as president of the new company after a merger with SBC, admitted he welcomed a world in which decisions based on regulatory concerns play a far smaller role. Asked what Congress should do on a Telecom Act rewrite, he replied: “My quick answer is ‘repeal it.'”

At least 3,000 consumer letters were filed in the FCC’s universal service docket (96-45) Wed. urging the FCC to reject a proposal to move to a flat fee for universal service fund (USF) contributions by carriers. The letters, all the same, appear to be written by a lobbyist group. At our deadline, its identity couldn’t be confirmed. However, one of the letters indicated a link to a website -- http//keepusffair.org -- sponsored by a consumer coalition that includes the Telecom Research & Action Center (TRAC). Signed by individuals from throughout the country, the letters told the FCC: “I do not want to pay more for my telephone service! I urge you to reject a flat fee proposal that would change how contributions are made to the Universal Service Fund… Under the flat fee you are considering, people who make few long distance calls would pay the same as people or businesses that make many calls… This is unfair.” The letter also makes reference to wireless service: “I use my wireless phone for safety, security and convenience. I don’t want to lose those benefits so big businesses can pay less than their fair share.”