Export Compliance Daily is a service of Warren Communications News.
Subscriber Login
State Telecom
to
articlessource documents
Refine Topic Search
Clear Terms

Search Primer

Term list: Separate terms with spaces, not commas or semicolons.

Multi-word term: Place inside quotes to ensure an exact match (e.g. "China import").

Acronyms: Use all capital letters to ensure the search is not looking for that letter sequence instead.

Required term: If a term must be included in any resulting articles, prefix it with a plus sign (e.g., +CBP).

Excluded term: If a term should be excluded from any articles being found, prefix it with a minus sign (e.g., -ruling).

Singular form: Always use the singular form when doing multi-word terms (e.g. "russian export control" instead of "russian export controls").

Shortest word form: When you have different word forms in a quoted (multi-word) term, you want to only include the shortest version if it is the last part of the expression (e.g., "entity list" instead of "entity listing" or "entity listed").

CBP Reminds Trade of Increase to MPF Fees on Jan. 1
November 22, 2017 |Customs

CBP reminded the trade community of upcoming increases to certain fees that take effect at the beginning of the new year, in a CSMS message sent Nov. 22. The changes are already in the ACE certification environment for trade testing, and the corresponding CATAIR programming requirements will be posted by Nov. 24, CBP said. "These changes will be in the ACE Production environment by November 30, 2017, and will be effective for entries with an entry date on or after January 1, 2018," it said. Effective that date, the minimum merchandise processing fee for formal entries will rise from $25, to $25.67, and the maximum MPF will increase from $485 to $497.99. The MPF ad valorem rate of 0.3464% will not change, CBP said. Other increased fees include the informal MPF to $2.05, the dutiable mail fee to $5.65, and the surcharge for manual entry or release to $3.08. CBP announced the fee increases on Nov. 1 (see 1710310044).

CBP Won't Bring Back Consignee ID Query in ACE, Software Developer Says
November 22, 2017 |Customs

CBP does not intend “at this time” to bring back its "KN" ultimate consignee query function in ACE, after the capability was shut off in September as part of the switch from the legacy Automated Commercial System, the agency said, according to a blog post by software developer CustomsNow. The query function, which allowed a filer to obtain the ultimate consignee’s name and address and identification number, was particularly valuable because it allowed brokers to find out if CBP had assigned an ID number to a non-resident importer of record, the blog post said. But in a “response from the ACE Support Hotline,” CBP said it “is aware of the trade communities concerns related to the discontinuation of the KN application” but “has decided not to develop or transition” KN in ACE, according to the blog post. “This is one update to ACE that seems to run contrary” to the principle “of making information more accessible and transparent,” CustomsNow said. “Brokers and local CBP port staff will have to take additional, and sometimes manual steps to determine this information.” CBP did not comment.

CBP Should Require Live Entry for Importers Who Owe AD/CV Duties, COAC Agrees
November 16, 2017 by Brian Bradley|Top News

CBP should require live entry for imports requiring antidumping and countervailing duty payments for importers that have unresolved non-payments of duties at the time of entry summary, or that haven’t paid an increased duty bill within 60 days of issuance, the Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee said in a recommendation approved at its Nov. 14 meeting in Washington. But the live entry for non-payment of duty increases should exempt importers with protest issues that can be filed within 180 days of duty of the rate advance, the COAC said. CBP should also establish and publish its policy for removing an importer from live entries after they rectify any payment problems, or demonstrate the importer wasn’t at fault for any late filing or payment in instances like technical or processing errors, it said.

Topics:Forced Labor