Congress shouldn’t include a bill that aims to combat counterfeit e-commerce goods in its China package (see 2201310033), said tech groups, consumer advocates and academics Tuesday in letters to congressional leaders. The Stopping Harmful Offers on Platforms by Screening Against Fakes in E-commerce (Shop Safe) Act would require foreign sellers on e-commerce platforms to accept personal jurisdiction in the U.S. and allow themselves to be served in a lawsuit. Platforms would have to make reasonable efforts to screen for sellers who are likely to sell counterfeit goods. The bill would “benefit foreign luxury brands, but harm smaller U.S. companies and consumers,” some 40 groups wrote. The Computer & Communications Industry Association, the Center for Democracy & Technology, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, NetChoice, Public Knowledge, the R Street Institute, Re:Create and Twitter signed. Academics with trademark expertise sent a separate letter saying the bill “would curtail many existing online marketplace offerings that currently give consumers greater choices and spur price competition that reduces consumer costs.” CCIA President Matt Schruers called it a “radical shift” in U.S. policy.

Google signed a definitive agreement to buy cybersecurity platform Mandiant for $5.4 billion in an all-cash deal, said the buyer Tuesday. Mandiant will join Google Cloud when the transaction closes later this year, it said. “Organizations are facing cybersecurity challenges that have accelerated in frequency, severity and diversity, creating a global security imperative,” said Google. “The cloud represents a new way to change the security paradigm by helping organizations address and protect themselves against entire classes of cyber threats.”

Ohio’s content moderation bill “conflicts with the First Amendment,” the Computer & Communications Industry Association said Tuesday as the state’s House Civil Justice Committee considered legislation at a hearing. Introduced by Republican Reps. Scott Wiggam and Al Cutrona, HB-441 would allow social media users to sue platforms for viewpoint discrimination, similar to laws passed in Texas and Florida. It lists deplatforming and other restrictions to user interaction as potential forms of censorship. There was no discussion on the bill in its fifth hearing Tuesday. The committee “has been repeatedly cautioned that its content moderation bill conflicts with the First Amendment by forcing private companies to carry speech,” said CCIA State Policy Director Alyssa Doom in an emailed statement.

The Supreme Court should review the “proper scope” of Communications Decency Act Section 230 immunity, Justice Clarence Thomas said Monday as the high court declined to review a Facebook-related sex-trafficking case. “Assuming Congress does not step in to clarify §230’s scope, we should do so in an appropriate case,” he wrote in a statement accompanying the denial of certiorari in Jane Doe v. Facebook. The case stems from a lawsuit a Facebook user filed against the platform. The plaintiff, listed as Jane Doe, was a minor when she received a friend request from an adult user, and was then lured into meeting up in person, raped, beaten and forced into sex trafficking in 2012, according to filings. The Supreme Court shouldn’t review Section 230 in this case because there are outstanding legal questions for the Texas Supreme Court, Thomas said.

ICANN made $1 million available to help maintain internet access for Ukrainians, it said Monday. The organization earlier refused the Ukraine government's request that it revoke country-code top-level domains (ccTLDs) .ru and .su to limit Russian internet access. ICANN "has a longstanding practice of coming to the technical support and aid of technical providers, such as ccTLD managers, to enable them to stay connected to the Internet's DNS [domain name system] and continue servicing their customers and region during times of crisis," a March 6 board resolution said. This time, board members also directed ICANN to provide funding to Ukraine "to support maintaining access to Internet infrastructure through these challenges." The funding runs until year's end. ICANN must work with other organizations on this, President Goran Marby told us at a virtual executive team Q&A at this week's ICANN meeting from San Juan, Puerto Rico: Help could involve satellite terminals, but it's too early to say and so far there has been no request from the Ukraine government. Also Monday, ICANN responded to concerns about domain name registrants in Ukraine being unable to renew their domains in a timely manner. It's considering the events in the region an extenuating circumstance under the 2013 registrar accreditation agreement, meaning registrars can extend renewal periods for people in affected areas. Earlier this month, the Ukrainian government asked ICANN to temporarily or permanently revoke the Russian ccTLDs and shutter DNS servers there (see 2203020002). But in a March 2 reply, Marby said ICANN's primary role with ccTLDs involves validating requests that come from authorized parties within the respective country or territory, and ICANN can't take unilateral actions to disconnect domains: Such a change in ICANN's process "would have devastating and permanent effects on the trust and utility of this global system." In addition, he said, the root server system is made up of many geographically distributed nodes maintained by independent operators. Nor can ICANN control internet access or content, he wrote; it must remain neutral and act in support of the global internet.

Facebook isn’t responsible for a dating app’s decision to use a woman's Facebook image for marketing purposes without consent, platform parent Meta argued Friday in docket 2:19-cv-04034. Philadelphia news anchor Karen Hepp sued Facebook in 2018 for running an ad from the dating app FirstMet, which used her image without consent. The platform violated her right to publicity, Hepp claimed. Facebook was a “passive distributor” of the ad, and Hepp didn’t show the platform benefited from the use of her likeness, Meta argued in a filing with the U.S. District Court in Philadelphia. The platform is immune from liability under the Pennsylvania Act as a "communications medium" without "actual knowledge," the platform said.

The owners of a weight loss app marketed to kids as young as 8 illegally collected their data without parental consent, DOJ and the FTC announced Friday in a $1.5 million settlement. WW, formerly Weight Watchers, and its subsidiary Kurbo violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, the agencies said. They “marketed weight management services for use by children as young as eight, and then illegally harvested their personal and sensitive health information,” FTC Chair Lina Khan said. “Our order against these companies requires them to delete their ill-gotten data, destroy any algorithms derived from it, and pay a penalty for their lawbreaking.” DOJ filed the complaint on behalf of the FTC in U.S. District Court in San Francisco. The defendants “possessed actual knowledge” that its application collected personal information like names, numbers and emails, plus information like height, weight, food intake and physical activity, DOJ said: They didn’t notify parents about the collection, as required by COPPA. The settlement isn’t an admission of wrongdoing, said Kurbo General Counsel Michael Colosi in a statement: “Kurbo takes child privacy very seriously ... Data collected in Kurbo’s paid counseling program is used in strict compliance with parental consent solely to help children learn better eating habits.” Limited data received in the free app was “designed to be collected in an anonymous environment and used solely for the purpose of helping the users develop better eating habits,” he said. Kurbo didn’t target children with ads, sell data to third parties or monetize its users in any way, he added: “No parents or children ever complained that Kurbo used their personal data in an inappropriate manner.”

The global volume of chatbot virtual assistant messaging traffic is forecast to increase to 9.5 billion transactions by 2026 from 3.5 billion in 2022, reported Juniper Research Thursday. The increasing adoption of omnichannel retail strategies by e-commerce merchants and the rising integration of chatbots within messaging platforms will drive that 169% growth over the next five years, it said. It predicts the rapid development of messaging app functionalities “will attract high-value online retailers to chatbot messaging apps over competing channels,” it said. Total retail spend for chatbot messaging apps in China will surpass $21 billion by 2026, with platforms such as WeChat “providing a definitive framework for chatbots that is branded for each retailer,” it said.

Oral argument in the tech industry’s lawsuit against a Texas social media law will help the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals understand how online platforms interact with the First Amendment and whether private companies have the right to “discriminate against speakers,” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) filed Wednesday in docket 21-51178. Platforms are incorrect that the First Amendment “gives them a right to discriminate freely against viewpoints, without any sunlight,” Paxton argued. It would “strain credulity to say Section 230 protects Platforms when they censor speakers based on race,” he wrote. “Likewise here, Section 230 does not protect them for censoring based on speaker viewpoint.” He also disagreed with claims the new law violates the First Amendment: Laws requiring entities to neutrally host speakers don’t implicate the First Amendment because such laws regulate platform conduct, not speech, he said.

A bipartisan group of state attorneys general announced an investigation Wednesday into the harms TikTok might have on young users and the company’s efforts to boost user engagement. AGs from California, Florida, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Jersey, Tennessee and Vermont joined the probe. President Joe Biden targeted youth mental health issues and links to social media during his State of the Union address Tuesday evening (see 2203010072). Texas AG Ken Paxton (R) is investigating TikTok separately (see 2202180034) for “potential facilitation of human trafficking and child privacy violations.” The probe will “look into the harms using TikTok can cause to young users and what TikTok knew about those harms,” said California AG Rob Bonta, D-Calif. AGs are interested in “strategies or efforts to increase the duration of time spent on the platform and frequency of engagement with the platform.” TikTok cares "deeply about building an experience that helps to protect and support the well-being of our community, and appreciate that the state attorneys general are focusing on the safety of younger users," the company said.