Despite tweets from GoodRx co-CEO Doug Hirsch saying the discount prescription medication provider doesn’t gather data and give advertisers its users’ personal health information, tracking technologies on its platform “knowingly and intentionally” intercepted plaintiff Hollis Wilson’s personal medical information, said a Monday class action (docket 4:23-cv-01293), in U.S. District Court for Northern California in Oakland.

The Republican attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri, plus the private plaintiffs in the social media censorship lawsuit against the Biden administration, seek leave to amend their complaint to add class allegations and to certify a class, said their motion Monday (docket 3:22-cv-01213) in U.S. District Court for Western Louisiana in Monroe. The defendants oppose the motion, it said.

Altice’s motion to dismiss the recording industry’s contributory copyright infringement complaint rests on the “false premise” that Altice, as an internet service provider, “can never be held liable under any legal theory for copyright infringement committed by its customers using its services on its watch,” said the plaintiffs’ sur-reply Monday (docket 2:22-cv-00471) in U.S. District Court for Eastern Texas in Marshall in opposition to the motion.

U.S. District Judge Michael Brown for Northern Georgia in Atlanta denied the PBS motion to dismiss plaintiff Jazmine Harris’ class action for failure to state a Video Privacy Protection Act claim, said his signed order Monday (docket 1:22-cv-02456). Harris alleges PBS disclosed her PBS.org personal viewing information to Facebook without her consent, in violation of the VPPA. Her proposed class includes all PBS.org subscribers who had their personal viewing information disclosed to Facebook.

By installing the Facebook Pixel code on its website, healthcare company Aspirus “effectively planted a bug” on plaintiff “John Doe’s” web browsers and forced him and other class members to “unknowingly disclose their private, sensitive and confidential health-related communications” with Aspirus to Facebook, alleged a Friday class action (docket 3:23-cv-00171) in U.S. District Court for Western Wisconsin in Madison.

The four causes of action plaintiff George Schwarz seeks to assert against Nissan North America arising from his loss of connected vehicle services through obsolete telematics equipment in his Nissan vehicles should be resolved through individual arbitration, said the automaker. Nissan filed a motion Monday (docket 3:22-cv-00933) in U.S. District Court for Middle Tennessee in Nashville to dismiss Schwarz's complaint, or in the alternative, to stay the proceedings and compel the dispute to arbitration.

Meta seeks the dismissal of a Jan. 27 complaint alleging it’s engaging in “viewpoint discrimination” against two private Facebook groups, called Wise Guys I and Wise Guys II, in violation of the First Amendment and the Texas social media law HB 20 (see 2301300023), said Meta’s motion Monday (docket 3:23-cv-00217) in U.S. District Court for Northern Texas in Dallas.

The FCC’s September 2018 small-cells declaratory ruling preempting aspects of local and municipal cell tower permit reviews (see 2210070046) is a “substantive rule” that shouldn’t be applied retroactively to the 2017 Roswell, Georgia, decision denying T-Mobile’s application to build a tower in a residential neighborhood, said U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg for Northern Georgia in Atlanta in a signed opinion and order Friday (docket 1:10-cv-01464).

Here are Communications Litigation Today's top stories from last week, in case you missed them. Each can be found by searching on its title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.

Rochester opposes Verizon’s motion, joined by plaintiffs Crown Castle and Extenet in the related cases, to exclude from evidence the spreadsheet created by Louie Tobias, the city’s director-telecommunications and special projects, on grounds it contains inadmissable hearsay, said the city’s memorandum of law Friday in U.S. District Court for Western New York in support of that opposition. The spreadsheet “is admissible as a public record,” and the motion should be denied, it said.