CBP will host a trade forum on Fines, Penalties and Forfeitures (FP&F) at 10 a.m. PST July 26, CBP said in a public bulletin. The forum will be at 25 Harbor Plaza, Long Beach, Calif. 90802. The presentation will be conducted by Robert Thierry, director of FP&F and Jeff DeHaven, deputy director of FP&F.
The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is seeking volunteers to participate in the document imaging system trial, said CBP in a CSMS message. The pilot allows importers and brokers that use ACE to submit official CBP documents and specified Participating Government Agency (PGA) forms via the Electronic Data Interchange (EDI).
CBP released a draft of discussion items from the Advisory Committee on Commercial Operations (COAC) working group on residue. Several issues are discussed in the draft, including bonds and a carrier’s ability to determine quantity and value. These issues and others will be discussed at the Aug. 15 COAC meeting in Seattle. See future issues of ITT for further coverage of the the draft.
CBP issued the following releases on commercial trade and related issues:
A listing of recent antidumping and countervailing duty messages from the International Trade Administration posted to CBP's web site as of July 18, along with the case number(s) and CBP message number, is provided below. The messages are available by searching on the listed CBP message number at http://addcvd.cbp.gov. (CBP occasionally adds backdated messages without otherwise indicating which message was added. ITT will include a message date in parentheses in such cases.)
CBP recently posted revised versions of its informed compliance publications entitled "Hand Tool Sets Classified Within Subheadings 8205.90.00 and 8206.00.00" (here) and "Distinguishing Bolts from Screws" (here). CBP said there were no substantive changes made to the revised versions.
CBP posted its textile and apparel enforcement statistics through the first two quarters of fiscal year 2012. Textiles and apparel seized in the first two quarters for intellectual property rights violations fell about 30% from the same period in 2011. Total value of such IPR seizures fell by about 41%. The value of all types of commercial fraud penalty actions is well above the corresponding period in 2011, even though the number of 2012 actions is about half those in the first two quarters of 2011.
CBP released its July 13 Customs Bulletin (Vol. 46, No. 29). While the Bulletin does not contain any ruling articles, it does list recent information collections and Court of International Trade decisions.
CBP issued the following releases on commercial trade and related issues:
Airlines for America (A4A) and the Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) Monday urged Congress to “focus its limited Customs and Border Protection (CBP) resources on better serving U.S. gateway airports rather than creating a new pay-to-play scheme that diverts funds overseas and puts U.S. jobs at risk.” In a joint letter to the Senate Homeland Security Subcommittee, the groups objected to a Homeland Security Department (DHS) spending proposal, which would allow foreign governments to pay for pre-clearance facilities at international airports, regardless of whether they are served by U.S. airlines and “without consideration to where the greatest need for CBP staffing exists.” If CPB re-allocates its “already scarce resources” to overseas facilities bankrolled by foreign governments, “our airlines and our customers would be disadvantaged in this classic ‘pay-to-play’ scenario,” said A4A CEO Nicholas Calio. “This kind of policy choice clearly undermines the ability of U.S. carriers to compete in the global marketplace and puts American jobs at risk.” Said ALPA President Lee Moak: “The safety and security of our passengers and crew is our top priority and we believe having private or third parties fund a government function may have significant unintended consequences for national security as well as the competitiveness of the U.S. airline industry.” In their letter to the committee, A4A and ALPA said that nothing in the proposed DHS spending plan stipulates that these agreements be vetted for national-security risks.