Supporters of the Universal Service Fund overhaul agreement brokered by USTelecom asked the chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate Commerce committees and their communications subcommittees for support. A Thursday letter was from USTelecom, AT&T, Verizon, CenturyLink, FairPoint, Frontier, Windstream, OPASTCO, the NTCA and the Western Telecommunications Alliance. “This universal service fund (USF) and intercarrier compensation reform framework represents the country’s best chance to stabilize, modernize, and expand rural networks for years to come,” the coalition said. “With our carefully balanced compromise, we believe the industry can work through a major transition process without damaging vital communication infrastructure or disrupting customer services.” The FCC has said it hopes to complete reform this fall, the coalition noted. “After years of frustration and dead-ends, we are on the precipice of reform and now have a rare opportunity to push for significant change in these vital programs. Please join us by encouraging the FCC to make this reform a reality.” In a letter to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, Arkansas Gov. Mike Beebe urged the FCC “to take advantage of this historic opportunity” presented by the broad industry agreement on universal service and intercarrier comp revisions. “We may never see a better chance than this, and it’s time to end the waiting for those without broadband,” Beebe, a Democrat, wrote in a letter dated and released Thursday.

Windstream’s Q2 profit was $93.2 million, up from $79 million in the same period last year. Though more work needs to be done, the USTelecom-brokered USF proposal is a good start, CEO Jeff Gardner said during an investor call Friday.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski’s effort to issue another joint public statement by the FCC commissioners on Universal Service Fund and intercarrier compensation system reform appeared to be in flux late Thursday, agency officials said. Genachowski had hoped to get his colleagues to sign another Web post, as they did in March. Then, the full commission had promised “a busy spring and summer” of reform work and a promise to move to order’s “within a few months” of the comment cycle’s end in May (CD March 16 p10). Commissioners apparently couldn’t agree on language in the proposed new post, the officials said. Efforts to reach Genachowski’s spokesman for comment were unsuccessful at deadline.

The longer the FCC delays in providing VoIP providers with legal certainty and consistency across their multi-state operations, the more difficult it will be to replace the “growing body of disparate state regulation with a single coherent national regime,” telecom groups said. The VON Coalition, TechAmerica, National Association of Manufacturers, Telecom Industry Association and Information Technology Council wrote the FCC Wednesday. They cited growing state efforts to regulate VoIP.

The House sponsors of last year’s Universal Service Fund overhaul bill support the FCC acting on the industry USF agreement brokered by USTelecom. Rep. Lee Terry, R-Neb., no longer plans to move USF legislation, aide Brad Schweer told us Wednesday. He said that Terry “will now be encouraging the FCC to produce details that reflect suggestions” proposed by the industry group. Terry’s former co-sponsor Rick Boucher agreed that the commission should move forward on its own.

Nearly all of the telcos that have borrowed from the Rural Utilities Service receive high-cost Universal Service Fund support, RUS said in an analysis (http://xrl.us/bk3xqr). Of the 480 companies that have borrowed for telecom infrastructure, 476, or 99 percent of them, receive interstate universal service cash, the RUS said. More than 70 percent of RUS’ borrowers rely on universal service for more than a quarter of their operating revenue, RUS said. A 5 percent reduction in universal service cash would strand some 98 borrowers, representing nearly $794 million in loans, RUS said. The three largest rural telecom associations, calling themselves the Save Rural Broadband alliance, seized on the RUS filing, saying it was “independent confirmation of a point Save Rural Broadband has long argued -- the FCC’s USF reforms will force many rural broadband providers to either delay their deployment of broadband services or go out of business.” Rural carriers made a separate peace with bigger incumbents last week and filed a “complementary” brief with the USTelecom-brokered industry agreement (CD Aug 1 p1). A spokesman for the three associations said the RUS filing had no bearing on the incumbent compromise.

Rural Cellular Association President Steve Berry sharply criticized the Universal Service Fund/intercarrier compensation proposal formally filed by a U.S. Telecom-organized group of carriers at the FCC Friday (CD Aug 1 p1). He argued it’s a wireline-centric plan that largely leaves wireless in the cold. Berry called the proposal “a joke.” RCA represents small to mid-sized carriers. Satellite broadband companies, who also were not part of negotiations on the proposal, also criticized it Monday. Consumer groups and states’ rights advocates expressed concerns, while executives representing small and mid-sized cable operators expressed support for elements of the plan.

Incumbent telcos were able to bang out an agreement on the Universal Service Fund and intercarrier compensation regime reforms after months of negotiations. The rest of industry said the real debate has only begun. The USTelecom-brokered agreement won a last-minute okay from the three biggest rural telecom associations Friday. Left out of the discussions, though, were cable, CLECs, states’ rights and consumer advocates, many of whom were already slinging arrows at Friday’s announcement. CompTel, XO Communications, NARUC, NCTA, Sprint Nextel and the Rural Cellular Association all issued statements praising the agreement as a step forward but raising substantive questions about the deal.

"The odds favor” the FCC adopting the USTelecom-brokered agreement on the Universal Service Fund and intercarrier compensation regime reforms, MF Global analyst Paul Gallant said Thursday. The so-called framework could be filed as early as Friday (CD July 28 p8). It “would be a neutral-to-positive” for publicly-owned, mid-sized rural carriers such as Frontier, CenturyLink and Windstream, Gallant said. “We also believe the plan would be a boost for AT&T and Verizon by reducing their overall payments into the federal and state subsidy mechanisms.” Despite some opposition, he expects the commission to adopt the USTelecom-brokered deal more or less as-is because FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has made USF and intercarrier comp reforms “a centerpiece of his National Broadband Plan” and the framework “would redirect federal subsidies from voice to broadband buildout, which is what the Broadband Plan called for.” Also, he said the proposal “has the support of a strong coalition” and Gallant “would not be surprised if it gained additional support” in the next few weeks, and “key legislators have indicated that the FCC is better suited than Congress to reform USF/ICC because of the level of detail required for reform. Congress’s key asks are that rural and urban interests are both clearly recognized, and that the overall USF … not grow larger -- and ideally shrink over time. We think the FCC’s final rules this Fall are likely to satisfy those criteria."

A breakaway group of rural telcos organized a last-ditch effort to keep their trade associations from signing on to a USTelecom-brokered agreement on Universal Service Fund and intercarrier compensation regime reforms. “It is simply a bad deal for rural America!” said a draft letter circulated by the Rural Broadband Alliance’s Diane Smith and Stephen Kraskin.