The FCC asked the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to hold Consumers' Research's challenge of the Q1 2024 USF contribution factor in abeyance until a separate challenge the group filed is decided (see 2401030069), said the commission's motion Friday (docket 24-60006). Consumers' Research previously challenged the Q1 2022 contribution factor, which the court heard en banc in September (see 2309190072). "Because these cases involve the same parties and the same legal issues, it would best serve the interest of judicial economy and efficiency for the court to hold this case in abeyance until it issues a ruling" in the earlier case, the FCC said.
Consumers' Research filed a new challenge of the FCC's Q1 2024 USF contribution factor in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Wednesday. It's the third time the group challenged a contribution factor with this court (see 2310030069). The contribution methodology and ultimate quarterly factor "exceed the FCC's statutory authority" and violate the nondelegation doctrine, the group said in its petition for review (docket 24-60006).
Consumers' Research filed a new challenge of the FCC's Q1 2024 USF contribution factor in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Wednesday. It's the third time the group challenged a contribution factor with this court (see 2310030069). The contribution methodology and ultimate quarterly factor "exceed the FCC's statutory authority" and violate the nondelegation doctrine, the group said in its petition for review (docket 24-60006).
Industry and consumer groups clashed on whether the FCC should reclassify broadband internet access as a Title II service under the Communications Act in comments posted through Friday in docket 23-320 (see 2310190020). Commenters against reclassification warned that it would stifle innovation and competition. Supporters said the proposal would ensure consumers have equal access to broadband ahead of anticipated federal broadband deployment programs.
The FCC didn't violate the nondelegation doctrine when it used the Universal Service Administrative Co. to calculate quarterly USF contribution factors and administer USF programs, a federal court ruled Thursday. In denying Consumers' Research's challenge of the FCC contribution factor (see 2306220062), the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals noted "all USAC action is subordinate to the FCC, and the FCC retains ultimate decision-making power."
The FCC didn't violate the nondelegation doctrine when it used the Universal Service Administrative Co. to calculate quarterly USF contribution factors and administer USF programs, a federal court ruled Thursday. In denying Consumers' Research's challenge of the FCC contribution factor (see 2306220062), the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals noted "all USAC action is subordinate to the FCC, and the FCC retains ultimate decision-making power."
Telecom companies raised concerns about adding state USF goals on service quality and other issues in comments posted Monday at the Nebraska Public Service Commission. And as the PSC considers sweeping Nebraska USF (NUSF) changes, Charter Communications warned that it might be unlawful to support broadband with a fund designed for telecom services. Small rural companies said the fund should support ongoing costs that make networks expensive in remote areas even after they are deployed.
Congress "handed over its taxing power without statutory limits" to the FCC, an agency "constrained only by its own precatory 'aspirations', and then for good measure let the agency redefine its own scope of taxing authority," Consumers' Research told the U.S. Supreme Court in a cert petition Friday (docket 23-456) challenging the FCC's USF contribution factor (see 2308030071). The group warned that the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding the 2021 Q4 contribution factor and the 5th Circuit's rehearing of the Q1 2022 USF contribution factor were "portending" a circuit "split." It asked SCOTUS to "grant review and reverse" the lower court's decision upholding the contribution methodology, calling USF the "poster child for the problems that result from the delegation of constitutionally vested authority."
Congress "handed over its taxing power without statutory limits" to the FCC, an agency "constrained only by its own precatory 'aspirations', and then for good measure let the agency redefine its own scope of taxing authority," Consumers' Research told the U.S. Supreme Court in a cert petition Friday (docket 23-456) challenging the FCC's USF contribution factor (see 2308030071). The group warned that the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding the 2021 Q4 contribution factor and the 5th Circuit's rehearing of the Q1 2022 USF contribution factor were "portending" a circuit "split." It asked SCOTUS to "grant review and reverse" the lower court's decision upholding the contribution methodology, calling USF the "poster child for the problems that result from the delegation of constitutionally vested authority."
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied a joint motion from the Benton Institute for Broadband & Society, Center for Media Justice and National Digital Inclusion Alliance to intervene on behalf of the FCC in Consumers' Research's new challenge of the USF Q4 2023 contribution factor (see 2310030069). An order posted Monday in case 23-60525 was denied "without prejudice" should the groups want to file amicus curiae.