A bill introduced by Sen. DeMint (R-S.C.) that would give the FCC authority to define what constitutes fair competition for consumers is based largely on ideas from the Progress & Freedom Foundation’s project on telecom reform. The bill, which has no co-sponsors, includes a substantial section on universal service fund (USF) reform -- the first major Senate telecom bill to address the matter. The provisions are based on research by experts PFF convened from universities, law firms and research groups (CD Dec 9 p3). DeMint’s bill would require the FCC to adopt within 6 months after enactment a new contribution mechanism based on phone numbers; place a $3.6 billion cap on distribution, in the form of performance-based block grants to states.

FCC Chmn. Martin made it clear he still backs a numbers-based approach to reforming the way companies contribute to the Universal Service Fund (USF), despite concerns about that method’s effect on low-volume telephone users. User groups have said a phone number- based approach would hike USF fees carriers pass on to customers.

Were the FCC to base the universal service contribution system on telephone numbers, elderly and low- income people would suffer financially, a coalition of public interest groups said Thurs. Emphasizing FCC Chmn. Martin’s support for a numbers-based plan, members of the Keep Universal Service Fund Fair Coalition said at a news conference the plan would hike phone charges paid by “the most vulnerable of Americans.” The current revenue-based collection plan only charges when long distance calls are made, but the numbers-based plan would charge a fixed $1 or $2 a month, said Linda Sherry, Consumer Action dir.- national priorities: “One of the most alarming aspects of the numbers-based proposal is that no one has yet produced an estimate of the effect of the change on low-income consumers… It does not make sense for the FCC or Congress to change the collection of USF funding without first taking a long, hard look at who would pay the piper for the so-called ’simplicity’ of a numbers-based plan.” The coalition released a report it said offers “the first public estimate of the number of vulnerable consumers… and the extra dollars they would be forced to pay” whether directly through higher USF costs or indirectly through higher phone rates. According to the report, about 16 million households, mostly low-income or elderly individuals, that generally make no long distance calls, would pay up to $383 million more “under the Martin scheme.” Another group of 27 million low-volume users would pay up to $324 million more, the report said. The FCC is considering several ways to reform the contributions system, which now collects from carriers about 10% of revenue that long distance calls generate. Carriers pass the costs on to consumers. The coalition offered a “compromise” plan in which the current revenue- based system would continue but with VoIP revenue added. The plan would cap contributions at 12-15% of interstate revenue. If that didn’t collect enough money to support the USF program, a small numbers-based contribution -- “cents rather than dollars” -- would take effect as a “fall back,” Sherry said. The FCC now uses a “pay as you use it” system and shouldn’t move to a numbers-based “pay as you don’t use it” plan, Sherry said. FCC officials didn’t comment on the groups’ analysis because a contributions reform plan hasn’t been proposed yet.

Universal service fund (USF) support would be used for broadband deployment, under a discussion draft released Thurs. of a bill by Reps. Terry (R-Neb.) and Boucher (D-Va.). The bill would expand the USF base by requiring payments into the fund by service providers that use telephone numbers or IP addresses or sell network connections. “To change USF, I believe that all who play must pay,” said Terry. He called the draft a vehicle for reform that would remedy “inequities that exist today.” Boucher said he’s seeking comments on the draft by Dec. 23 and plans to introduce a bill next year.

Clearer rules and procedures would go far to improve management of the universal service fund (USF), the FCC was told by a variety of organizations. USF management can be confusing and inefficient for contributors and recipients, according to some comments, but many said the problems don’t stem from the Universal Service Administrative Co. (USAC) the non-profit that administers USF. The agency had sought comments on the entire USF program, including the high-cost fund, E-rate and smaller programs (CD June 15 p8).

State lawmakers from across the U.S. will tackle telecom and technology issues this week at the National Conference of State Legislatures’ annual conference in Seattle. Proposed state and national telecom law rewrites and wrangles over municipal Wi-Fi are among the hot topics at the 5-day conference, which begins today (Tues.). About 7,000 state legislators, policy experts, advocates, govt. leaders and media are expected to attend.

State lawmakers from across the U.S. will tackle telecom and technology issues this week at the National Conference of State Legislatures’ annual conference in Seattle. Proposed state and national telecom law rewrites and wrangles over municipal Wi-Fi are among the hot topics at the 5-day conference, which begins today (Tues.). About 7,000 state legislators, policy experts, advocates, govt. leaders and media are expected to attend.

The FCC voted at its open meeting Fri. to reduce regulation of wireline broadband service by reclassifying it as an “information service,” in line with the FCC’s treatment of cable modem service. The U.S. Supreme Court in June upheld the agency’s cable modem classification in the Brand X case, triggering action on the wireline companion piece which had been placed on hold during the litigation.

The FCC voted at its open meeting Fri. to reduce regulation of wireline Internet access service by reclassifying it as an “information service,” in line with the FCC’s treatment of cable modem service. The U.S. Supreme Court in June upheld the agency’s cable modem classification in the Brand X case, triggering action on the wireline companion piece which had been placed on hold during the litigation. DSL is the most common wireline Internet access service.

As FCC staff and commissioners continued negotiating over terms of the proposed wireline broadband order Thurs., lobbyists continued blitzing commissioners’ offices to make sure their views were reflected in the talks. At our deadline it still wasn’t known if the agency would get enough agreement on contested issues to place the broadband item on today’s (Fri.’s) agenda. The FCC had delayed its Thurs. meeting until today, reportedly to give it more time to reach consensus. The item would generally lessen regulation of wireline-provided broadband service by reclassifying it as an information service. However, judging from the continual discussions at the agency, there appeared to be many nuances within that general description of the proposed order.