Sprint Chmn. Gary Forsee called on the FCC to bring “much-needed clarity by promptly ruling that phone-to-phone VoIP should pay access charges.” Speaking at a Sprint investors meeting Wed. in N.Y., he said his company would take a high profile in addressing VoIP issues this year, pushing regulators to eliminate regulatory uncertainty: “Our perspective is to take prudent positions on initiatives such as UNE-P and VoIP to minimize the effect of regulatory mixed messages.” He expressed concern that “regulatory uncertainty” could interfere with the industry’s moving forward: “What this industry needs from regulation is clear, rational rules, especially surrounding VoIP and intercarrier compensation. Right now it’s a mess.”

The Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service appears to be “very much divided” in its effort to seek improvements in the Universal Service Fund (USF)and, as a result, probably will present the FCC with some “conflicting views,” Western Wireless CEO John Stanton said Tues. in an interview with Communications Daily. Even in areas where there’s a majority view in the Joint Board’s recommendations, there probably will be an “active minority” view, perhaps leading to divisions at the FCC as well, Stanton predicted.

More than 10 voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) providers led by the Voice on the Net (VON) Coalition are getting together to create an unprecedented group to encourage a public policy that refrains from applying traditional telecom regulation to Internet voice communications. The ad hoc coalition, expected to be announced formally before the end of the year, will try to form voluntary agreements on some key common carrier obligations, such as universal service, E911, disability access and law enforcement monitoring of VoIP calls. “These legitimate concerns can be addressed without imposing heavy regulation on VoIP and… if they are addressed successfully the political pressure to regulate VoIP will dissipate,” said VON Coalition Chmn. Tom Evslin, who represents the ad hoc group.

The Kan. Corporation Commission (KCC) opened a docket to review its procedures for reporting and recording state universal service fund revenue. All carriers are required to contribute to the plan and must report annually on how much of their contributions have been recovered from customers. The new investigation responds to KCC staff concerns that some carriers with monthly flat-rate calling plans weren’t reporting contribution recovery on a consistent basis. Consumer groups also had raised a question of whether customers were being burdened by overstated fund assessments. The staff also wants repeal of the current USF contribution exemption given to one-way paging services. Intervenors in the proceeding (Case 03-GIMT-932-GIT) must register by May 23. Comments are due July 2 and replies July 29.

FCC legal advisers said Wed. they were aware of concerns by rural ILECs that universal service money was shrinking while requests for it were growing with the arrival of competitive carriers in rural areas. But they also told members of the National Telecom Co-op Assn. (NTCA) that those were very difficult problems to solve because the Telecom Act encouraged competition as well as universal service. The advisers told NTCA that numerous universal service issues were teed up at the Commission, including what services should be funded and how the support money should be raised, and they wouldn’t be easy to solve. NTCA members were in town for their annual Legislative & Policy Conference.

The FCC Wireline Bureau proposed a universal service contribution factor for the 2nd quarter that it expected to result in lower line charges on long distance customers’ bills, although wireless subscribers weren’t likely to see similar short-term relief. The 2nd-quarter contribution factor for the first time reflects a system based on providers’ projections of collected end-user revenue instead of on historical billing data. The proposed contribution factor would be 9.0044%, which an industry source said was the highest to date and resulted from a series of interim changes adopted by the FCC while it studied broader modifications.

FCC is expected to act by mid-Dec. on interim changes aimed at improving way carriers make contributions to Universal Service Fund (USF). Sources said Commission had planned to act by end of Nov. but decided to delay action until Comr.-Designate Jonathan Adelstein was sworn in.

Voice on the Net (VON) Coalition said it supported connections-based approach to funding universal service, concept backed by several telecom industry groups. FCC is considering changing current revenue-based method of assessing universal service contributions. “A connections- based contribution methodology will ensure that USF [Universal Service Fund] payments are assessed in a fair and economically efficient manner,” group said. VON Coalition includes companies offering products and services for use on Internet or IP networks, including Intel and Microsoft.

There appeared to be little agreement among regulators or witnesses Fri. at FCC en banc hearing on how to fix current universal service system, whether it needed major overhaul or tweaking and, for that matter, whether it needed fixing at all. FCC scheduled hearing and invited state members of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service as best way “to gain input in the shortest time on various views and proposals for reform,” FCC Comr. Abernathy said as she opened hearing. Asked by Comr. Copps if there really was sense of urgency, consultant Kathleen Wallman said that was one of “the first assessments” Joint Board would have to make. “I don’t know if there is a sense of urgency on the part of all parties,” she said. “Some participants may disagree.” Wash. State U. Prof. William Gillis said he didn’t think there was consensus on urgency of reforming universal service because some parties would benefit more from change than others.

ISPs could benefit from industry proposal to revise way it collects contributions from telecom carriers for universal service fund (USF), Information Technology Assn. of America (ITAA) told FCC in comments filed late Mon. Commission had asked for comments on proposal to move to connection-based methodology, meaning carriers’ contributions would be based on end-user connections -- generally wires to homes and offices or wireless phone numbers -- rather than based on interstate revenue. While proposal involves rather technical adjustments, it has elicited strong feelings because it would require wireless and local exchange carriers to contribute more and long distance carriers less. Under current system, long distance carriers are main contributors. In both scenarios, customers ultimately pay because carriers pass costs on to them in form of fees on bills.