Colleges’ Universal Service Fund (USF) costs will rise “astronomically” if the FCC moves fund contributions from a revenue- to a numbers-based approach, universities and a higher education group told Communications Daily. Colleges could have to choose between removing dormitory phones and paying the drastically higher fees, they said. Either way, there will be “negative financial, technical and social impact,” said Jeri Semer, executive director of the Association for Communications Technology Professionals in Higher Education (ACUTA). FCC chairman Kevin Martin last May said he has “long favored” a numbers-based model and plans to propose to reform USF contribution this fall (CD May 15 p1).

Arguments against capping universal service subsidies to competitive carriers are based on “short-term self interest rather than long-term public interest,” OPASTCO told the FCC. “Excessive growth in the High-Cost program that is threatening its sustainability is attributable solely to competitive ETCs,” said OPASTCO in reply comments on the cap proposal. On the other hand, extending the interim cap to all rural telecom companies would “seriously threaten” wireline rural carriers, OPASTCO said. “At greatest risk would be continued service to subscribers in the most remote and highest-cost regions that may not have other reliable service options,” said the group, which represents wireline LECs.

N.Y. residents would pay $150 million more into the Universal Service Fund (USF) if the contributions system is changed as proposed, consumer groups said Tues. Contributions are made by telecom providers, which charge consumers for them. Plans to shift from a revenue-based payment to a per-connection charge, such as one based on phone numbers, would boost N.Y.’s share from $407 million to $555 million, said the League of United Latin American Citizens, N.Y. State Alliance for Retired Americans and the Keep Universal Service Fund Fair Coalition. The connections- based proposal would “take a bad situation and make it even worse” because New Yorkers already pay more into the fund than they get back, the groups said in a press teleconference. Accusing “big phone companies” of pushing the connections system, the groups said the FCC shouldn’t move from “a consumer-friendly, pay-for-what-you-use tax on long-distance to a regressive per-connection charge that would be imposed on every phone line whether or not consumers made any long distance calls at all.”

Rep. Boucher (D-Va.) asked OPASTCO to promote his Universal Service Fund (USF) bill (HR-2054) on the Hill Wed. at the group’s legislative conference. The measure would revamp the USF program by widening the contribution base to include all those providing network connections, and expand services to pay for broadband. “We are in a hypercompetitive global market,” Boucher told OPASTCO members, stressing the importance of getting faster broadband deployment throughout the country, especially in rural areas. USF is under stress “today as never before,” Boucher said, adding that he and the bill’s chief co-sponsor, Rep. Terry (R-Neb.), have worked 3 years on “comprehensive” legislation to deal with problems in the system. Boucher’s bill has 11 co-sponsors, all but one Republicans. It has attracted support from AT&T, Qwest, Embarq and Alltel and NTCA, Boucher said, and the challenge is to encourage trade groups that like the bill to urge other lawmakers to sign up. “This bill will not be passed into law without your personal assistance,” Boucher told OPASTCO members. OPASTCO Pres. John Rose said the group applauds the bill but thinks it wise to pursue regulatory as well as legislative fixes.

FCC Chmn. Kevin Martin plans to proceed as soon as the fall on a proposal to change how telecom providers contribute to the Universal Service Fund, he said Mon. after a speech. Martin told reporters he is waiting for a U.S. Appeals Court, D.C., decision on a related universal service issue before teeing up a proposal to replace the revenue-based contribution system with one relying on phone numbers.

A hefty increase in the amount of money telecom carriers, and ultimately consumers, must contribute to the Universal Service Fund beginning in April has triggered renewed calls by industry groups for USF reform. The FCC late Thurs. raised the so-called “contribution factor” -- the proportion of interstate and international revenue that telecom carriers must donate to the fund -- to 11.7% from 9.7% for the 2nd quarter, starting in April. The industry money goes to USF subsidies.

Mass. consumers will benefit if the FCC shifts universal service contributions from a revenue base to phone numbers, a pro-numbers group said Fri., challenging predictions of harm to consumers by the Mass. Consumer Coalition and the Keep USF Fair Coalition (CD March 9 p10). Opponents used “incorrect data and ‘funny math,'” said the USF by the Numbers Coalition. The opposing group “exaggerates how high numbers- based assessments would be” and overstates what Mass. customers now contribute to USF, said USF by the Numbers, composed of AT&T, CTIA, NCTA, USTelecom, Verizon, VON Coalition, DSL.Net, GCI and IDT Corp.

Mass. consumers stand to lose $158 million a year if proposals to shift federal universal service contributions from a revenue base to a numbers or connections base are adopted, according to the Mass. Consumer Coalition and the Keep USF Fair Coalition. The groups, at a news conference in Boston, said the shift would hurt most the rural, minority, low-income and elderly phone customers who make few long distance calls. They said universal service contributions from Mass. would jump to $266 million a year on a connection- based assessment, from $108 million under the current system based on long distance revenues, assuming a fee of $1.50 a connection. The groups said those who use little long distance would suffer mammoth increases in their USF contributions, with the result that those who don’t make long distance calls will be subsidizing those who use lots of long distance.

Some industry groups are using an FCC notice of proposed rulemaking on USF contribution methodology to argue for moving to a number-based method of calculating payments -- a question the FCC never raised, NASUCA claimed. The VON Coalition, CTIA and other groups said tweaks to current methodology will fall far short of needed reform.

Deregulating the Bells’ broadband transmission services would hurt rural telephone companies that rely on them for Internet backbone service, the National Telecom Co-op Assn. told the FCC in comments filed Thurs. The Bells are the only Internet backbone providers available to rural telephone companies in many areas, NTCA said: “NTCA is concerned for its members who will rely on BellSouth and Qwest for access to the IP backbone.”