The House Commerce Committee received 50 responses to its white paper on USF policy, the committee revealed Thursday, posting all comments online (http://1.usa.gov/1lBg6gN). It had issued the white paper in August as part of the Communications Subcommittee initiative to overhaul the Communications Act, and responses were due Sept. 19. It was the fifth white paper on aspects of the overhaul issued this year. Respondents include major companies such as AT&T and Verizon as well as state groups like NARUC and NASUCA and the tech company Microsoft, which has responded to every white paper so far. Other commenters include the Nebraska Public Service Commission, the Oregon Telecom Association and the Telecommunications Association of Maine. “We urge Congress to encourage the FCC to create an inclusive environment where all eligible providers have an opportunity to compete for support with the goal of closing the gap between broadband available in urban and rural areas,” the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association told House lawmakers. Microsoft lauded the shift in focusing USF on broadband and encouraged Congress to “continue to afford the FCC with authority and flexibility to reform the mechanism for contributing to the universal service fund, as needed.” The Alaska Communications System noted that “contrary to the prevailing view in Washington,” it “has never considered the USF system as ‘broken,'” but said it’s “vital to include safeguards that ensure that available funding is used efficiently.”
The House Commerce Committee received 50 responses to its white paper on USF policy, the committee revealed Thursday, posting all comments online (http://1.usa.gov/1lBg6gN). It had issued the white paper in August as part of the Communications Subcommittee initiative to overhaul the Communications Act, and responses were due Sept. 19. It was the fifth white paper on aspects of the overhaul issued this year. Respondents include major companies such as AT&T and Verizon as well as state groups like NARUC and NASUCA and Microsoft, which has responded to every white paper so far. Other commenters include the Nebraska Public Service Commission, the Oregon Telecom Association and the Telecommunications Association of Maine. “We urge Congress to encourage the FCC to create an inclusive environment where all eligible providers have an opportunity to compete for support with the goal of closing the gap between broadband available in urban and rural areas,” the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association told House lawmakers. Microsoft lauded the shift in focusing USF on broadband and encouraged Congress to “continue to afford the FCC with authority and flexibility to reform the mechanism for contributing to the universal service fund, as needed.” The Alaska Communications System noted that “contrary to the prevailing view in Washington,” it “has never considered the USF system as ‘broken,'” but said it’s “vital to include safeguards that ensure that available funding is used efficiently.”
Calls by education and library groups, and FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel in a speech Wednesday, to increase E-rate funding are running into opposition from telcos, in comments filed in the E-rate modernization Further NPRM. The Independent Telephone and Telecommunications Alliance and USTelecom said they worry expanding E-rate could cut into other USF programs like the Connect America Fund.
Calls by education and library groups, and FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel in a speech Wednesday, to increase E-rate funding are running into opposition from telcos, in comments filed in the E-rate modernization Further NPRM. The Independent Telephone and Telecommunications Alliance and USTelecom said they worry expanding E-rate could cut into other USF programs like the Connect America Fund.
An FCC order on circulation would generically ask the agency’s Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service to examine changes to USF contribution methodology without recommending how the group should proceed, said agency and industry officials in interviews this week.
An FCC order on circulation would generically ask the agency’s Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service to examine changes to USF contribution methodology without recommending how the group should proceed, said agency and industry officials in interviews this week.
The FCC must address the overall spending of the USF, not use “savings” from universal service reform to expand other USF programs, FCC Commissioner Mike O'Rielly said Friday in remarks to the commission’s Consumer Advisory Committee (CAC). O'Rielly said he wanted to lay down this marker as the agency takes up Lifeline reform. He also suggested that at least one of the CAC members should come from a group representing taxpayers.
For all the last-minute negotiations, partisan bickering and congressional pressure involved in Friday’s FCC E-rate modernization order (WID July 14 p3) -- not to mention the sweep of bringing Wi-Fi connections to millions of schoolchildren nationally -- several major issues facing the program were left on the table, advocates involved in the debate told us. “This was a tough sell, but the next set of deliberations will be even harder,” said Bob Wise, president of the Alliance for Excellent Education and former West Virginia Democratic governor, who supported FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler’s proposal. “There will be an incredible amount of debate."
For all the last-minute negotiations, partisan bickering and congressional pressure involved in Friday’s FCC E-rate modernization order (CD July 14 p1) -- not to mention the sweep of bringing Wi-Fi connections to millions of schoolchildren nationally -- several major issues facing the program were left on the table, advocates involved in the debate told us. “This was a tough sell, but the next set of deliberations will be even harder,” said Bob Wise, president of the Alliance for Excellent Education and former West Virginia Democratic governor, who supported FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler’s proposal. “There will be an incredible amount of debate."
FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler has sidestepped likely partisan Capitol Hill battles surrounding E-rate for now due to the nature of his overhaul, apparently focusing on Wi-Fi and not immediately touching the fund’s contribution rate and size, lobbyists and observers told us. They predict political rancor will come in later phases of the E-rate revamp when those parts will be inevitably addressed. The prime Hill critics now are Democratic architects of the original 1996 Telecom Act E-rate provisions, who question the proposal in more granular ways and urge the agency to listen as E-rate beneficiaries express fears, sending a critical letter Tuesday. The FCC will vote on Wheeler’s item Friday, and it’s been controversial among FCC Republicans. (See separate report in this issue.)