NTCA and USTelecom asked the FCC to give rural telcos broadband USF contribution relief while the agency seeks to revise the subsidy system's assessments of industry for funding. The commission should provide "targeted, temporary forbearance from the application of USF contribution requirements ... with respect to broadband Internet access transmission services provided by RLECs pending the completion of comprehensive USF contributions reform," they said in a petition Wednesday in docket 06-122. The groups sought the USF contribution relief for such RLEC broadband services until the commission decides whether any and all broadband services "should be required to contribute to support of federal USF programs or completes some other form of contributions reform." They said regulatory forbearance would have a "de minimis effect" on USF contributions. RLECs are being subjected to "discriminatory and anti-competitive treatment" under a 2005 wireline broadband order that allowed them to offer broadband on a common-carrier basis -- to recover costs for such service via access rates and USF -- but only if they agreed to make USF contributions, NTCA and USTelecom said. Other providers haven't been required to make USF contributions, even under the 2015 net neutrality order that reclassified broadband as a Communications Act Title II telecom service because the agency provided USF contribution forbearance, they said. A federal-state joint board is looking at USF contribution issues in an effort to make recommendations to the FCC for possible changes. The FCC, CTIA, NTCA and Public Knowledge didn't comment.

California utility commissioners may decide if text messaging can be assessed USF fees, perhaps making it the first state to rule on whether texting is a telecom or information service. Public Utilities Commissioners could vote as soon as June 15 to open a rulemaking on whether text messaging is a telecom service that may be included in revenue-based surcharges for CPUC’s public purpose programs (PPP), which include California LifeLine, the Advanced Services Fund and other state programs, the agency said Friday. CTIA petitioned for a ruling that texting is an information service not subject to the fees, but consumer groups urged the CPUC to classify texting as a telecom service that may be assessed.

California utility commissioners may decide if text messaging can be assessed USF fees, perhaps making it the first state to rule on whether texting is a telecom or information service. Public Utilities Commissioners could vote as soon as June 15 to open a rulemaking on whether text messaging is a telecom service that may be included in revenue-based surcharges for CPUC’s public purpose programs (PPP), which include California LifeLine, the Advanced Services Fund and other state programs, the agency said Friday. CTIA petitioned for a ruling that texting is an information service not subject to the fees, but consumer groups urged the CPUC to classify texting as a telecom service that may be assessed.

The USF contribution factor could spike in Q3 from 17.4 percent to 19.6 percent or more of carriers' U.S. interstate and international (long-distance) telecom end-user revenue, said industry consultant Billy Jack Gregg in his quarterly email update. He cited Universal Service Administrative Co. projections of increased USF demand, particularly for E-rate school and library discounts, as the driver, and said the contribution (or assessment) factor could go even higher if projected industry revenue declines, as it has been trending. A 19.6 percent factor would be "the highest assessment factor ever." The previous high was 18.2 percent in Q1 of 2016, he said Wednesday. Some reacted to us with concern.

The USF contribution factor could spike in Q3 from 17.4 percent to 19.6 percent or more of carriers' U.S. interstate and international (long-distance) telecom end-user revenue, said industry consultant Billy Jack Gregg in his quarterly email update. He cited Universal Service Administrative Co. projections of increased USF demand, particularly for E-rate school and library discounts, as the driver, and said the contribution (or assessment) factor could go even higher if projected industry revenue declines, as it has been trending. A 19.6 percent factor would be "the highest assessment factor ever." The previous high was 18.2 percent in Q1 of 2016, he said Wednesday. Some reacted to us with concern.

NTCA and members pressed the FCC for $260 million in additional annual funding for rate-of-return USF mechanisms distributing model-based and non-model support. Without the additional funding for the non-model mechanisms, standalone broadband loop rates could be $20 to $100 over the $42 broadband-only monthly benchmark the commission specified in its March overhaul order, said an NTCA filing posted Monday in docket 10-90 on meetings with aides to all five commissioners and Wireline Bureau officials. Those rates are not for the actual retail service to consumers, but just the broadband-only loop components of that service, it said. When the component costs are combined "with unavoidable costs" -- access recovery charges, transport and transit costs, other operating costs and USF contribution fees -- "the actual retail broadband prices to consumers (putting aside any prospect of actual return or profit margin) would need to be $90 to $110 per month in some cases, and in some very rural service areas with few standalone broadband consumers to start the rates could approach $200 per month," the group said.

NTCA and members pressed the FCC for $260 million in additional annual funding for rate-of-return USF mechanisms distributing model-based and non-model support. Without the additional funding for the non-model mechanisms, standalone broadband loop rates could be $20 to $100 over the $42 broadband-only monthly benchmark the commission specified in its March overhaul order, said an NTCA filing posted Monday in docket 10-90 on meetings with aides to all five commissioners and Wireline Bureau officials. Those rates are not for the actual retail service to consumers, but just the broadband-only loop components of that service, it said. When the component costs are combined "with unavoidable costs" -- access recovery charges, transport and transit costs, other operating costs and USF contribution fees -- "the actual retail broadband prices to consumers (putting aside any prospect of actual return or profit margin) would need to be $90 to $110 per month in some cases, and in some very rural service areas with few standalone broadband consumers to start the rates could approach $200 per month," the group said.

Parties disagreed on the adequacy of the scope and pace of broadband deployment under a Telecom Act Section 706 mandate, and on the metrics the FCC should use. Major wireline and wireless telco groups said advanced telecom capability (ATC) is being rolled out to all Americans in a reasonable and timely way, and urged the commission to keep or soften its current ATC criteria. Smaller wireless carriers and consumer advocates said broadband isn't being deployed widely and quickly enough, and urged the commission to raise and expand ATC benchmarks. Comments were posted Tuesday and Wednesday in docket 16-245 in response to a notice of inquiry, which cited ATC and broadband similarities but said not all broadband services provide ATC.

Parties disagreed on the adequacy of the scope and pace of broadband deployment under a Telecom Act Section 706 mandate, and on the metrics the FCC should use. Major wireline and wireless telco groups said advanced telecom capability (ATC) is being rolled out to all Americans in a reasonable and timely way, and urged the commission to keep or soften its current ATC criteria. Smaller wireless carriers and consumer advocates said broadband isn't being deployed widely and quickly enough, and urged the commission to raise and expand ATC benchmarks. Comments were posted Tuesday and Wednesday in docket 16-245 in response to a notice of inquiry, which cited ATC and broadband similarities but said not all broadband services provide ATC.

Nebraska Rural Independent Companies urged a Federal-State Joint Board to recommend the FCC make USF contribution system changes similar to what NRIC has advocated in a state proceeding, said a filing in docket 96-45 on a meeting with FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, chairwoman of the joint board, and an aide. "NRIC supports implementation of a connections-based contribution mechanism applicable to residential consumers, and continuation of the revenues-based contribution mechanism for business/enterprise and special access at least for a transition period," said an attached summary of the group's state positions. "A connection would be defined as 'a wired line or wireless channel used to provide end users with access to any assessable service.' Assessable service would be defined as 'a service which allows a connection to other networks through inter-network routing as a means to provide the telecommunications.'” In other meetings it summarized, NRIC made the same pitch to Commissioner Chris Nelson of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission and Commissioner Ronald Brise of the Florida Public Service Commission, two state members of the board.