The International Trade Commission recently released Revision 5 to the 2023 Harmonized Tariff Schedule, which extended four COVID-related product exclusions covered by secondary subheading 9903.88.66 until June 1, 2023 (see 2305120054). Those products are currently exempted from additional duties imposed by Section 301 tariffs of 25% under subheading 9903.88.01.

Former U.S. trade representative Robert Lighthizer, who got the most attention from members of a House select committee at a lengthy hearing on Chinese economic aggression, argued that the actions President Donald Trump took to discourage imports from China were not nearly enough, and that even removing China from most favored nation status would not be enough to protect American manufacturers from China's predation, because some of the Column 2 tariffs, such as those on cars, are not high enough. Ending China's MFN status "would be one of the greatest things you could possibly do for American manufacturing," he declared.

Actuator cable assemblies assembled in Mexico from Chinese motors and various parts from China, Taiwan, the U.S. and Mexico are products of China based on the motor's predetermined end use, CBP said in a recent ruling -- the first publicly released that cites the Court of International Trade's recent decision in an origin case involving Cyber Power (see 2302270064).

The following lawsuits were recently filed at the Court of International Trade:

The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of May 8-14:

Trade Law Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. All articles can be found by searching on the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.

The Customs Rulings Online Search System (CROSS) was updated May 15 with the following headquarters rulings (ruling revocations and modifications will be detailed elsewhere in a separate article as they are announced in the Customs Bulletin):

The following lawsuits were recently filed at the Court of International Trade:

International Trade Today is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case they were missed. All articles can be found by searching on the titles or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.

Granting a government counterclaim that unfinished steel tubes are subject to Section 301 tariffs and imposing the additional duties would be an unconstitutional action by the Court of International Trade "imposing a tax solely based on judicial power," Maple Leaf Marketing argued in a May 12 brief at the Court of International Trade (Maple Leaf Marketing v. United States, CIT # 20-03839).