While most of the witnesses on the first day of Section 301 tariffs hearings on Aug. 20 asked that items be taken off the tariff list, several companies and a trade group asked that more products be taxed. Mike Branson, executive vice president of Rheem Manufacturing's air conditioning division, said he was pleased that several subheadings in heading 8415 were on the latest list of targets. But he said 8415.94.40 and 8414.90.80 need to be added, "otherwise Chinese exporters of finished good air conditioners will be able to avoid the tariffs."

The Consumer Technology Association asked the Section 301 hearing panel to remove 380 items from the $200 billion list, arguing that there will be a drop in consumer demand as prices rise. Because many of the items are inputs, there will not be a direct 25 percent cost increase, but CTA commissioned a study that said there could be price increases of up to 6 percent, even on U.S. products, because of tariffs on circuit boards.

CBP is seeing an increase in bond insufficiency related to new sections 301 and 232 tariffs and expects that trend to continue, the agency told Colleen Clarke, vice president-business development at Roanoke Insurance Group. The National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Association of American said in an Aug. 20 email to members that CBP told Clarke that the agency "is urging brokers and sureties to be proactive in determining bond sufficiency." Roanoke Trade mentioned the issue during a webinar last month (see 1807260011).

CBP on Aug. 21 issued new filing instructions for goods subject to Section 301 duties, in light of recent changes to how the duties apply to goods from China and a new group of tariff subheadings that will become subject to the tariffs in the coming days. The agency’s CSMS message contains updated information on how to file Chapter 98 entries for several subheadings of that chapter newly subject to duties (see 1808160049), as well as how to enter goods under the 279 eight-digit subheadings for which Section 301 duties take effect at 12:01 a.m. on Aug. 23 (see 1808080020).

International Trade Today is providing readers with some of the top stories for Aug. 13-17 in case they were missed.

Manufacturers in foreign-trade zones are being treated worse than other U.S. manufacturers when their products are on Section 301 lists, said National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones President Erik Autor. He said he's attempting to educate the U.S. trade representative on how zones work in an effort to resolve the problem. Autor said that these products are "being erroneously treated as imports from China" if the highest-valued component is from China. He said this mistake is happening because Census is trying, however imperfectly, to measure the amount of imports by country. Because the imports did not go through customs when they entered the U.S., the Census bureau asks about the finished products leaving FTZs, and assigns a country of origin to it by determining what country was responsible for the greatest proportion of its imported components.

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative should expand its use of the Generalized System of Preferences to encourage beneficiaries to make policy and enforcement changes, the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation said in a report released Aug. 20. The agency's foreign trade barrier and intellectual property reports should more directly guide decisions "to self-initiate reviews of whether GSP beneficiaries are breaching the program’s trade, market access, or intellectual property criteria," the ITIF said. The USTR is already reviewing GSP benefits for Indonesia, India, Kazakhstan, Thailand and Turkey over various issues (see 1808150034).

The U.S. economy will take a $2.4 billion annual hit in reduced consumer spending and other damage if the Trump administration imposes 25 percent tariffs on connected devices and printed circuit assembles as part of its threatened third tranche of Trade Act Section 301 duties against Chinese imports, said a CTA impact study Friday. An earlier study that CTA released with the National Retail Federation, well before the first two tranches of tariffs were imposed, said duties on $50 billion worth of Chinese imports, coupled with Chinese retaliation, would reduce U.S. GDP by nearly $3 billion and destroy 134,000 American jobs (see 1805010024).

David Mathison, founder of furniture leather company Leather Miracles, asked a panel of government officials to strike Harmonized Tariff Schedule headings 4107.11.50, leather upholstery, and 9401.90.50, leather for auto seats, from the Section 301 tariff list. He spoke as one of 62 witnesses testifying on the first of six days of scheduled hearings to determine which products will face additional tariffs. Mathison's career has been disrupted by China before. The rise of Chinese shoe manufacturing, and then Chinese furniture manufacturing, drove his previous company, Lackawanna Leather, out of business after about 100 years of operation.

The U.S. economy will take a $2.4 billion annual hit in reduced consumer spending and other damage if the Trump administration imposes 25 percent tariffs on connected devices and printed circuit assembles as part of its threatened third tranche of Trade Act Section 301 duties against Chinese imports, said a CTA impact study Friday. An earlier study that CTA released with the National Retail Federation, well before the first two tranches of tariffs were imposed, said duties on $50 billion worth of Chinese imports, coupled with Chinese retaliation, would reduce U.S. GDP by nearly $3 billion and destroy 134,000 American jobs (see 1805010024).