The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative announced a new round of Section 301 tariff exclusions (see 2006090003). New subheading 9903.88.49 will be used for the new exclusions. The new set of exclusions are reflected in “two 10-digit [Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)] subheadings and 32 specially prepared product descriptions, which together respond to 55 separate exclusion requests,” according to the notice. The product exclusions apply retroactively to Sept. 1, 2019, and will remain in effect until Sept. 1, 2020.
Sharply reduced April imports of the largest TVs were the result of COVID-19 factory shutdowns in Mexico, where the supply chain for big-screen sets predominantly resides, said newly released Census Bureau data accessed Saturday through the International Trade Commission’s DataWeb tool. Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador ordered the closure of nonessential factories and businesses March 31.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative issued another set of product exclusions from the fourth group of Section 301 tariffs on goods from China. The new exclusions from the tariffs include "two ten-digit HTSUS subheadings and 32 specially prepared product descriptions, which together respond to 55 separate exclusion requests," according to the notice. The product exclusions apply retroactively to Sept. 1, 2019, the date the fourth set of tariffs took effect. The exclusions will remain in effect until Sept. 1, 2020.
Sharply reduced April imports of the largest TVs were the result of COVID-19 factory shutdowns in Mexico, where the supply chain for big-screen sets predominantly resides, according to newly released Census Bureau data accessed June 6 through the International Trade Commission’s DataWeb tool. Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador ordered the closure of nonessential factories and businesses on March 31.
While the U.S.-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 gives the president clear authority to terminate Hong Kong's special status if China violates the island's autonomy, the fact that Hong Kong has its own membership in the World Trade Organization could complicate the matter, the Congressional Research Service says. In a June 5 “legal sidebar,” CRS said that not only is it not clear when the administration would end Hong Kong's special trade status, it's also not clear whether the U.S. would say it no longer acknowledges Hong Kong's membership in the WTO.
The International Trade Commission on June 4 issued Revision 12 to the 2020 Harmonized Tariff Schedule. This latest edition implements a June 2 notice from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative that extends some exclusions from list 1 Section 301 tariffs on products from China (see 2005290020). The extended exclusions are listed in new U.S. Note 20(ccc) to Chapter 99 in the tariff schedule, and goods entered under these exclusions are classifiable under new subheading 9903.88.0050.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is starting Trade Act Section 301 investigations into digital services taxes (DSTs) that were adopted or are under consideration, the agency said Tuesday. Investigations focus on Austria, Brazil, the Czech Republic, EU, India, Indonesia, Italy, Spain, Turkey and the U.K. Comments are due July 15. Evidence "suggests the DSTs are expected to target large, U.S.-based tech companies," USTR said. "The European Commission is considering a DST as part of the financing package for its proposed COVID-19 recovery plan." The EU's delegation to the U.S. didn't comment. The "investigation initially will focus on the following concerns with DSTs: discrimination against U.S. companies; retroactivity; and possibly unreasonable tax policy," the USTR said. While the Information Technology Industry Council "hoped to avoid further escalation of tensions, increasingly-expansive unilateral tax measures have necessitated a stronger response,” said CEO Jason Oxman. “ITI continues to support the U.S. government’s efforts to investigate these complex trade issues." Tariffs are a possible result of Section 301 investigations. The agency previously started a Section 301 investigation into France over such taxes and tariffs that were proposed but not implemented (see 1912030002). “An increasing number of countries have proposed or enacted discriminatory and unilateral digital taxes in recent months, despite ongoing [OECD] negotiation," noted Internet Association Director-Trade Policy Jordan Haas. "The U.S. must continue sending a strong message to trading partners that targeted discriminatory taxes against U.S. firms are not an appropriate solution." Instead of "unilateral DSTs, the world needs a multilateral solution," said U.S. Chamber of Commerce Head-International Affairs Myron Brilliant. "The Chamber supports efforts to address these challenges through multilateral negotiations under the aegis of the OECD. We urge all parties to double down on those negotiations.”
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is starting Trade Act Section 301 investigations into digital services taxes (DSTs) that were adopted or are under consideration, the agency said Tuesday. Investigations focus on Austria, Brazil, the Czech Republic, EU, India, Indonesia, Italy, Spain, Turkey and the U.K. Comments are due July 15. Evidence "suggests the DSTs are expected to target large, U.S.-based tech companies," USTR said. "The European Commission is considering a DST as part of the financing package for its proposed COVID-19 recovery plan." The EU's delegation to the U.S. didn't comment. The "investigation initially will focus on the following concerns with DSTs: discrimination against U.S. companies; retroactivity; and possibly unreasonable tax policy," the USTR said. While the Information Technology Industry Council "hoped to avoid further escalation of tensions, increasingly-expansive unilateral tax measures have necessitated a stronger response,” said CEO Jason Oxman. “ITI continues to support the U.S. government’s efforts to investigate these complex trade issues." Tariffs are a possible result of Section 301 investigations. The agency previously started a Section 301 investigation into France over such taxes and tariffs that were proposed but not implemented (see 1912030002). “An increasing number of countries have proposed or enacted discriminatory and unilateral digital taxes in recent months, despite ongoing [OECD] negotiation," noted Internet Association Director-Trade Policy Jordan Haas. "The U.S. must continue sending a strong message to trading partners that targeted discriminatory taxes against U.S. firms are not an appropriate solution." Instead of "unilateral DSTs, the world needs a multilateral solution," said U.S. Chamber of Commerce Head-International Affairs Myron Brilliant. "The Chamber supports efforts to address these challenges through multilateral negotiations under the aegis of the OECD. We urge all parties to double down on those negotiations.”
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is starting Trade Act Section 301 investigations into digital services taxes (DSTs) that were adopted or are under consideration, the agency said Tuesday. Investigations focus on Austria, Brazil, the Czech Republic, EU, India, Indonesia, Italy, Spain, Turkey and the U.K. Comments are due July 15. Evidence "suggests the DSTs are expected to target large, U.S.-based tech companies," USTR said. "The European Commission is considering a DST as part of the financing package for its proposed COVID-19 recovery plan." The EU's delegation to the U.S. didn't comment. The "investigation initially will focus on the following concerns with DSTs: discrimination against U.S. companies; retroactivity; and possibly unreasonable tax policy," the USTR said. While the Information Technology Industry Council "hoped to avoid further escalation of tensions, increasingly-expansive unilateral tax measures have necessitated a stronger response,” said CEO Jason Oxman. “ITI continues to support the U.S. government’s efforts to investigate these complex trade issues." Tariffs are a possible result of Section 301 investigations. The agency previously started a Section 301 investigation into France over such taxes and tariffs that were proposed but not implemented (see 1912030002). “An increasing number of countries have proposed or enacted discriminatory and unilateral digital taxes in recent months, despite ongoing [OECD] negotiation," noted Internet Association Director-Trade Policy Jordan Haas. "The U.S. must continue sending a strong message to trading partners that targeted discriminatory taxes against U.S. firms are not an appropriate solution." Instead of "unilateral DSTs, the world needs a multilateral solution," said U.S. Chamber of Commerce Head-International Affairs Myron Brilliant. "The Chamber supports efforts to address these challenges through multilateral negotiations under the aegis of the OECD. We urge all parties to double down on those negotiations.”
CBP in Detroit seized about 4,600 remote-controlled helicopter drones worth some $69,000 that didn't “meet Federal Communications Commission labeling requirements,” the agency said in a June 3 news release. The goods, which were imported from China and were subject to Section 301 tariffs, were also found to be undervalued by about $62,000, CBP said. The imports “were seized June 1 in conjunction with a previous shipment containing more than $400,000 in counterfeit merchandise” that was seized in late May, the agency said.