Most observers expect the U.S. Court of International Trade to pick the first-filed Section 301 complaint from HMTX Industries and Jasco Products as the lead case, and to stay the roughly 3,700 other actions while HMTX is litigated, blogged law firm Neville Peterson Thursday. “More than two months after the HMTX case was filed, however, there has been surprisingly little action,” other than “some minor skirmishing from some plaintiffs,” it said. Some litigants favor picking a complaint other than HMTX as the lead case or joining it with other actions that raise constitutional challenges to the Section 301 tariffs, it said. Still others argue HMTX should proceed on its own, since the CIT “will not consider constitutional issues if cases can be decided on non-constitutional grounds,” it said. DOJ’s deadline to file answers to the HMTX action “technically” has lapsed, it said: Though the CIT likely won’t hold DOJ “in default” for failing to respond, “the urgency for establishment of a case management plan is increasing.” Plaintiffs' attorneys on their own have established an “informal” steering committee to manage the case, it said, saying the committee “confers with some regularity.”

House Ways and Means Committee member Stephanie Murphy, D-Fla., said that although “the politics of trade are fairly tricky,” she feels confident in saying “things can't get any worse” for free trade during the Biden administration. Murphy, one of two members of the House speaking on a Cato Institute webinar about what to expect in trade with a new president, said she's encouraged by President-elect Joe Biden's choices for the secretaries of the treasury and state, and the head of the National Security Council, because all of the individuals recognize that trade is an important tool in foreign policy.

President-elect Joe Biden's incoming administration can support advanced manufacturing in the U.S. by “immediately lifting” the Section 301 tariffs on a “targeted list” of information and communications technology components and inputs sourced from China, blogged Alan Kohlscheen, IBM director-import compliance and supply chain security, and Michael DiPaula-Coyle, director-international trade policy. “Limited, early removal” of the most “counterproductive” China tariffs could provide relief for U.S. manufacturing, while leaving the new administration space “to negotiate further tariff changes based on Chinese market access commitments,” said the authors Wednesday. The tariffs have raised IBM’s sourcing costs by “tens of millions of dollars,” they said. “These imports do not represent high-value technology products -- rather, they are necessary inputs into U.S.-made systems and include such items as printed circuit board assemblies, mechanical parts, fans, power distribution units, power supplies, and cables -- largely available only from Chinese sources.” The incoming administration “can give a direct boost to U.S. manufacturing through targeted tariff relief on these sorts of component parts and inputs,” said Kohlscheen and DiPaula-Coyle. “Such a step would provide immediate benefits to U.S. manufacturing while also redirecting U.S. policy toward more international, and coordinated, action to address Chinese market access issues.” The Biden transition team didn’t respond to questions. Biden told New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman Tuesday evening that he won’t make “any immediate moves” on China policy after taking office. “And the same applies to the tariffs,” he said. “I’m not going to prejudice my options.” A “major priority” in the opening weeks of the new administration will be to “try to get us back on the same page with our allies” and develop a “coherent strategy” toward China, he said.

The European Union's equivalent of secretary of state is calling for coordination with the U.S. on regulatory conformity, choosing a new director-general at the World Trade Organization and restoring the appellate body there, in a policy paper released Dec. 2. High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell Fontelles said they need to intensify trilateral work between the EU, Japan and the U.S. on how to address market-distorting practices that WTO rules aren't effective in addressing. “We should also work together to bring forward the WTO e-commerce negotiations,” he said.

President-elect Joe Biden's incoming administration can support advanced manufacturing in the U.S. by “immediately lifting” the Section 301 tariffs on a “targeted list” of information and communications technology components and inputs sourced from China, blogged Alan Kohlscheen, IBM director-import compliance and supply chain security, and Michael DiPaula-Coyle, director-international trade policy. “Limited, early removal” of the most “counterproductive” China tariffs could provide relief for U.S. manufacturing, while leaving the new administration space “to negotiate further tariff changes based on Chinese market access commitments,” said the authors Wednesday. The tariffs have raised IBM’s sourcing costs by “tens of millions of dollars,” they said. “These imports do not represent high-value technology products -- rather, they are necessary inputs into U.S.-made systems and include such items as printed circuit board assemblies, mechanical parts, fans, power distribution units, power supplies, and cables -- largely available only from Chinese sources.” The incoming administration “can give a direct boost to U.S. manufacturing through targeted tariff relief on these sorts of component parts and inputs,” said Kohlscheen and DiPaula-Coyle. “Such a step would provide immediate benefits to U.S. manufacturing while also redirecting U.S. policy toward more international, and coordinated, action to address Chinese market access issues.” The Biden transition team didn’t respond to questions. Biden told New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman Tuesday evening that he won’t make “any immediate moves” on China policy after taking office. “And the same applies to the tariffs,” he said. “I’m not going to prejudice my options.” A “major priority” in the opening weeks of the new administration will be to “try to get us back on the same page with our allies” and develop a “coherent strategy” toward China, he said.

President-elect Joe Biden won't remove Section 301 tariffs until he makes a full review of the phase 1 agreement and consults with Japan, South Korea and Europe “so we can develop a coherent strategy,” New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman reported Dec. 2. Biden said free-market countries need more leverage to “actually produce progress on China’s abusive practices,” such as illegal subsidies to corporations, forced tech transfers and stealing intellectual property.

Lawyers for importers that have filed suit under the extensive ongoing Section 301 litigation have established an “informal” steering committee to manage the case, law firm Neville Peterson said in a Dec. 1 blog post, adding that the committee “confers with some regularity.” Most observers expect the U.S. Court of International Trade will pick the first-filed Section 301 complaint from HMTX Industries and Jasco Production as the lead case, and stay the roughly 3,700 other actions while HMTX is litigated, the law firm said.

President-elect Joe Biden's incoming administration can support advanced manufacturing in the U.S. by “immediately lifting” the Section 301 tariffs on a “targeted list” of information and communications technology components and inputs sourced from China, blogged Alan Kohlscheen, IBM director-import compliance and supply chain security, and Michael DiPaula-Coyle, director-international trade policy. “Limited, early removal” of the most “counterproductive” China tariffs could provide relief for U.S. manufacturing, while leaving the new administration space “to negotiate further tariff changes based on Chinese market access commitments,” said the authors Wednesday. The tariffs have raised IBM’s sourcing costs by “tens of millions of dollars,” they said. “These imports do not represent high-value technology products -- rather, they are necessary inputs into U.S.-made systems and include such items as printed circuit board assemblies, mechanical parts, fans, power distribution units, power supplies, and cables -- largely available only from Chinese sources.” The incoming administration “can give a direct boost to U.S. manufacturing through targeted tariff relief on these sorts of component parts and inputs,” said Kohlscheen and DiPaula-Coyle. “Such a step would provide immediate benefits to U.S. manufacturing while also redirecting U.S. policy toward more international, and coordinated, action to address Chinese market access issues.” The Biden transition team didn’t respond to questions. Biden told New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman Tuesday evening that he won’t make “any immediate moves” on China policy after taking office. “And the same applies to the tariffs,” he said. “I’m not going to prejudice my options.” A “major priority” in the opening weeks of the new administration will be to “try to get us back on the same page with our allies” and develop a “coherent strategy” toward China, he said.

House Ways and Means Committee member Stephanie Murphy, D-Fla., said that although “the politics of trade are fairly tricky,” she feels confident in saying “things can't get any worse” for free trade during the Biden administration. Murphy, one of two members of the House speaking on a Cato Institute webinar about what to expect in trade with a new president, said she's encouraged by President-elect Joe Biden's choices for the secretaries of the treasury and state, and the head of the National Security Council, because all of the individuals recognize that trade is an important tool in foreign policy.

Section 301 tariffs raised IBM's sourcing costs by tens of millions of dollars, and on Dec. 2 the company asked the incoming administration to “immediately” remove the tariffs on tech inputs such as mechanical parts, fans, power distribution units, power supplies, cables and printed circuit board assemblies. “A limited, early removal of the most counter-productive of the China tariffs could provide relief for U.S. manufacturing, while leaving the new Administration space to negotiate further tariff changes based on Chinese market access commitments,” said Alan Kohlscheen, IBM's import compliance executive, and Michael DiPaula-Coyle, IBM's director of international trade policy.