Export Compliance Daily is a service of Warren Communications News.
Subscriber Login
Penalties and Courts
to
articlessource documents
Refine Search
Clear Terms

Search Primer

Term list: Separate terms with spaces, not commas or semicolons.

Multi-word term: Place inside quotes to ensure an exact match (e.g. "China import").

Acronyms: Use all capital letters to ensure the search is not looking for that letter sequence instead.

Required term: If a term must be included in any resulting articles, prefix it with a plus sign (e.g., +CBP).

Excluded term: If a term should be excluded from any articles being found, prefix it with a minus sign (e.g., -ruling).

Singular form: Always use the singular form when doing multi-word terms (e.g. "russian export control" instead of "russian export controls").

Shortest word form: When you have different word forms in a quoted (multi-word) term, you want to only include the shortest version if it is the last part of the expression (e.g., "entity list" instead of "entity listing" or "entity listed").

‘Procedural Burden’ Looms as 2 Tariff Lists Set to Expire 7 Weeks Apart
March 23, 2022 |Other U.S.

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is wading into “unchartered waters” if it tries extending the lists 1 and 2 Section 301 tariffs on China past their four-year expiration deadlines under the 1974 Trade Act (see 2203140004), David Olave, a Sandler Travis associate and trade policy adviser, said in an email. List 1 is due to expire July 6, List 2 only seven weeks later on Aug. 23.

Topics:Country of origin cases
‘Procedural Burden’ Looms As 2 Tariff Lists Expire 7 Weeks Apart: Lawyer
March 23, 2022 by Paul Gluckman|Trade

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is wading into “unchartered waters” if it tries extending the Lists 1 and 2 Section 301 tariffs on China past their four-year expiration deadlines under the 1974 Trade Act (see 2203120001), emailed David Olave, a Sandler Travis associate and trade policy adviser. List 1 is due to expire July 6, List 2 on Aug. 23. The Trade Act binds USTR to hold a notice-and-comment review period in the last 60 days before each tranche expires if the agency gets written requests from “domestic beneficiaries” to extend the tariffs, said Olave Monday: “We know what the statute says, but we do not have regulations or precedent to rely upon on how to read the statute.” It’s possible USTR “could consider the 301 Actions for Lists 1 and 2 as part of the same investigation,” he said. “The original move by USTR approved tariffs for up to $50 billion, so the two lists are in fact linked to that first scope of action. Therefore, USTR could consider tackling both lists at the same time with regards to comments.” USTR alternatively could try splitting the lists into “two separate tranches and ask for comments on List 1 first and then List 2,” said Olave. “I do not see major legal reasons against doing that, only the overall procedural burden of dealing with two separate and similar issues almost parallel to one another,” he said. “We’ll see what USTR’s next step is soon.” USTR didn’t respond to questions Tuesday.

‘Procedural Burden’ Looms as 2 Tariff Lists Set to Expire 7 Weeks Apart
March 22, 2022 |Customs

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is wading into “unchartered waters” if it tries extending the lists 1 and 2 Section 301 tariffs on China past their four-year expiration deadlines under the 1974 Trade Act (see 2203140004), David Olave, a Sandler Travis associate and trade policy adviser, said in an email. List 1 is due to expire July 6, List 2 only seven weeks later on Aug. 23.