A spokesperson for South Korean semiconductor company SK Hynix said the company welcomed the recent U.S. decision to allow the firm to continue supplying its China factories with certain chipmaking tools (see 2310100051). In an Oct. 10 email, the spokesperson confirmed that SK Hynix received a “waiver with regard to the export control regulations” and said the company “greatly appreciate[d]” the South Korean and U.S. governments “for working closely with the companies through close communication and consultation until the decision is reached.”
South Korean semiconductor companies Samsung and SK Hynix received assurances from the Commerce Department that they will continue to be allowed to supply certain chipmaking tools to their China-based factories, continuing authorizations they had received as part of Commerce’s Oct. 7 China-related chip export controls rule, Reuters reported Oct. 9.
The State Department on Oct. 6 withdrew from interagency review a final rule that could have loosened export restrictions on certain controlled defense shipments and services for Ethiopia. The rule was initially sent for interagency review Aug. 17 and could remove Ethiopia from the International Traffic in Arms Regulations’ list of proscribed countries (see 2308210008).
Huawei’s 7 nanometer chip smartphone breakthrough earlier this year (see 2309120005, 2309150020 and 2309190052) signals that although China hasn’t yet reached the “global state of the art for semiconductor manufacturing,” the “gap between the peak technological level of China and that of the rest of the world has shrunk” despite U.S. export controls, said Gregory Allen of the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
U.S. sanctions and export controls have so far “not been sufficient to deter” China’s Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp., China analysts James Mulvenon and Joseph McReynolds said in a report released this month on Mulvenon’s website. The report said Applied Materials, Lam Research, Tokyo Electron, KLA and other chip companies are “effectively selling a wide range of relevant tools” used for 28 nanometer use to China, but SMIC likely is using them for 7 nm production.
The Bureau of Industry and Security sent an interim final rule for interagency review this week that could update U.S. export controls on certain semiconductor manufacturing items and make modifications to the Entity List. The rule was sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs Oct. 4. A BIS spokesperson declined to comment about what the rule will entail.
The Bureau of Industry and Security completed a round of interagency review for a final rule that would implement export control changes and updates agreed to during the 2022 Wassenaar Arrangement cycle. The rule was sent for review July 18 (see 2307190015), with the review completed Sept. 29.
The Bureau of Industry and Security recently completed rounds of interagency reviews for two final rules that could align its controls with multilateral export control bodies. The first, completed Sept. 20, would align its regulations with certain changes made by the multilateral Australia Group. The second, completed Sept. 26, would align the agency's export controls with changes recently made by the multilateral Missile Technology Control Regime. The Australia Group rule (see 2308280013) and the MTCR rule were both sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs Aug. 25 (see 2308280014).
LONDON -- Gyorgy Molnar, head of the multilateral Wassenaar Arrangement secretariat, said he is “cautiously optimistic” the regime will be able to agree to more export control proposals this year as opposed to the prior year. Molnar didn’t specifically name Russia but said a “number” of proposals last year “were blocked by one participating state.”
The State Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls last week issued two new risk compliance matrices, one for businesses and one for universities, to help them comply with the International Traffic in Arms Regulations. The matrices, which have been under work at DDTC since at least November (see 2211100023), are meant to guide exporters, manufacturers, researchers, academics and others through an assessment of their ITAR export control risks. DDTC said that after using the documents to conduct an ITAR risk assessment, organizations and researchers should “use that data to create an effective and tailored ITAR compliance program and allocate resources as appropriate to prioritize and mitigate those risks.”