DOJ has been looking closely at companies’ approaches to communications platforms since revising its corporate compliance program criteria earlier this year, Caitrin McKiernan, a Steptoe lawyer, said during a webinar hosted by the firm last week. She said she’s working with multiple clients in assessing their compliance programs to make sure they meet the new standards set by DOJ in March, which could affect whether the agency offers to resolve an investigation without criminal charges (see 2303030056).
The Bureau of Industry and Security shouldn’t renew the one-year authorizations it gave to certain foreign chip companies as part of its Oct. 7 China chip controls unless the agency makes “significant” changes to the restrictions when it finalizes the controls in the coming months, said Derek Scissors, a China policy expert with the American Enterprise Institute. Scissors said extending the licenses beyond their October expiration would “undermine” the Biden administration’s goal of denying China advanced semiconductor technology and unfairly advantage foreign companies over U.S. firms.
Despite some opposition from Democrats, the House Foreign Affairs Committee this week advanced multiple bills designed to ease technology sharing restrictions within the Australia-U.K.-U.S. (AUKUS) partnership. Two bills would create new license exceptions for certain defense exports to Australia and the U.K., and another would authorize the sale of Virginia Class submarines to Australia to help the Biden administration implement AUKUS, a deal that commits the U.S. to delivering the submarines within the next decade (see 2303130035).
The U.S. this week issued new guidance on its various voluntary self-disclosure policies for sanctions and export control violations, urging companies to disclose offenses and stressing the importance of “robust” compliance programs. The six-page “compliance note,” the second jointly issued by the Commerce, Treasury and Justice departments (see 2303020054), outlines DOJ’s recently updated disclosure policies for criminal export and sanctions violations, the raft of changes made to the Bureau of Industry and Security's administrative enforcement policies over the past year, and the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s procedures for assessing voluntary disclosures. The notice also describes the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s whistleblower program.
The Bureau of Industry and Security will now require companies that report boycott requests to inform BIS of the “specific party who made the request,” Matthew Axelrod, the agency’s top export enforcement official, said in a July 26 policy memo to enforcement employees. Companies previously were only required to report to BIS that they received the boycott request and the “country from which the request originated,” the memo said. Information on the identity of the requester will allow BIS to “more easily investigate and hold accountable” parties engaging in a boycott.
Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo this week declined to say when she expects the Bureau of Industry and Security to finalize its Oct. 7 China chip controls (see 2210070049, saying it’s more important to her that the agency takes its time and gets the updated restrictions “right.” She also said she doesn’t see Chips Act funding and restrictions on American chips sales to China as contradictory and denied reports that the administration has delayed new export controls against China in an effort to limit damage to its relationship with Beijing.
The Bureau of Industry and Security this week signed an “agreement” with the Office of Foreign Assets Control to improve coordination among the two agencies’ export control and sanctions enforcement teams, said Matthew Axelrod, the top BIS export enforcement official. The agreement will help in “formalizing our close coordination and partnership,” Axelrod said during a July 26 Society for International Affairs conference, according to a copy of his speech emailed by BIS.
A former U.S. trade representative and treasury secretary this week cautioned the Biden administration as it prepares to introduce a new outbound investment screening regime, saying new authorities like these tend to expand over time and could eventually be used beyond their intended purpose.
U.S. policymakers should explore new ways to restrict transfers of items and services that China may be using to advance its artificial intelligence capabilities, such as data, algorithms and human capital, the Center for a New American Security said in a report this week. Although the administration should “aggressively” restrict exports to China of advanced semiconductor equipment, the report said Washington also needs to “seek out creative tools to regulate other basic building blocks of AI.”
Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching for the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.