Since AT&T announced Saturday that “data-specific fields” were part of a data set involving 7.6 million current and 65.4 million former customers released on the dark web March 16, nine negligence class actions have been filed in U.S. District Court for Northern Texas in Dallas, including five by Kendall Law.
The U.S. District Court for Virginia’s Oct. 26 ruling dismissing Hanan Elatr Khashoggi’s privacy case against NSO Group Technologies and Q Cyber Technologies for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction was “in error,” said Khashoggi's opening brief (docket 23-2234) in the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Monday.
The personally identifiable information (PII) of some 7.6 million current and 65.4 million former AT&T customers was compromised in a data breach last month due to the carrier's failure to implement "adequate and reasonable" cybersecurity "procedures and protocols,” a negligence class action alleged Saturday (docket 3:24-cv-00757) in U.S. District Court for Northern Texas in Dallas. It was one of at least eight filed over the breach in the Texas court since Saturday.
American Express aided and “conspired with” Facebook to intercept communications sent and received by customers in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act, alleged a class action Friday (docket 1:24-cv-02408) in U.S. District Court for Southern New York in Manhattan.
Though OnStar “ostensibly provides” Wi-Fi and location information for emergency services in case of an accident, customers were not aware the subscription in-vehicle security and communications service was “tracking data points about their driving” and sending it to their auto insurance companies to justify a rate increase, said a privacy class action (docket 2:24-cv-10804) Friday in U.S. District Court for Eastern Michigan in Detroit.
The Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN) and India-based Times Internet Ltd. share subscribers’ personally identifiable information (PII) to unrelated third parties alongside video content subscribers requested or obtained from their websites, allege two Video Privacy Protection Act class actions filed Thursday.
Every iPhone sale “guarantees revenue streams well beyond the initial purchase price,” said a class action Thursday (docket 24-cv-434085) in Santa Clara County Superior Court alleging violations of California’s Business and Professions Code. Plaintiff Kyle Whiteside of San Diego bought a new iPhone 13 in July 2021 from an Apple Store in Escondido, California.
General Motors, OnStar and LexisNexis Risk Solutions secretly collect consumers’ driver behavior data through vehicle computer systems and sell that data without consumers' full notice, knowledge or consent, alleged a Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) class action Wednesday (docket 3:24-cv-00524) in U.S. District Court for Middle Pennsylvania in Scranton.
Apple’s anticompetitive conduct forced Louis Levine and class members to suffer “overcharge damages,” alleged his class action Wednesday (docket 2:24-cv-04284) in U.S. District Court for New Jersey in Newark. The class period covers iPhone individuals or entities that bought iPhones directly from Apple, other than for resale, from March 2020 to the present.
Despite assuring a customer that she wouldn’t be charged for service or hardware after a FiOS installation wasn’t successful, Verizon billed her and then reported her account as delinquent to credit reporting agencies (CRAs) Experian, TransUnion and Equifax, alleged plaintiff Ayesha Gordon in a Fair Credit Reporting Act complaint (docket 1:24-cv-00486) Wednesday in U.S. District Court for Eastern Virginia in Alexandria.