Experts believe the California PUC will follow its own schedule, rather than the FCC's shot clock, in reviewing Charter Communications' acquisitions of Bright House Networks and Time Warner Cable. No one expects the deal to be done within the FCC's 180 days, particularly given the volume of data requested by the FCC, Paul Goodman, telecommunications senior legal counsel at the Greenlining Institute, told us. Given the Charter/TWC/BHN size, “this is more like an eight- or nine-month process,” he said, saying the CPUC typically “works hard to match” the FCC schedule. Any California delays (see 1511270047) shouldn’t derail the deal unless Charter starts to see signs federal or state regulators won’t be satisfied with answers or conditions and no sign-off is likely, Goodman said.
Pointing to entry into the mobile services market and better services for small and mid-sized businesses, Charter Communications is trying to shore up its public interest argument for its proposed purchases of Bright House Network and Time Warner Cable. But critics of the $89.1 billion pair of transactions continue to issue broadsides.
Pointing to entry into the mobile services market and better services for small and mid-sized businesses, Charter Communications is trying to shore up its public interest argument for its proposed purchases of Bright House Network and Time Warner Cable. But critics of the $89.1 billion pair of transactions continue to issue broadsides.
Its bankruptcy practically behind it, LightSquared CEO Doug Smith told us Friday its priority now is finding common ground with the GPS industry on LightSquared's terrestrial broadband plans and resolving that long-standing clash. "We're thrilled to have the bankruptcy completed," Smith said after the FCC's ruling earlier that day on LightSquared's change of control application: "We can get back to work resolving the remaining issues around the spectrum itself. That's our primary focus -- coexistence with GPS. I think there's an opportunity for common ground here."
LTE-U Forum backers and 3GPP allies continue to duke it out before the FCC. CTIA fired back Thursday at complaints that efforts to ensure coexistence between LTE-unlicensed and Wi-Fi are being partially hijacked. Those calls "for a formal standards review upends the permissionless innovation that is the hallmark of unlicensed spectrum policy," CTIA said in a submission in docket 15-105.
LTE-U Forum backers and 3GPP allies continue to duke it out before the FCC. CTIA fired back Thursday at complaints that efforts to ensure coexistence between LTE-unlicensed and Wi-Fi are being partially hijacked. Those calls "for a formal standards review upends the permissionless innovation that is the hallmark of unlicensed spectrum policy," CTIA said in a submission in docket 15-105.
LTE-U Forum backers and 3GPP allies continue to duke it out before the FCC. CTIA fired back Thursday at complaints that efforts to ensure coexistence between LTE-unlicensed and Wi-Fi are being partially hijacked. Those calls "for a formal standards review upends the permissionless innovation that is the hallmark of unlicensed spectrum policy," CTIA said in a submission in docket 15-105.
Labeling prospective programming bundling as a bad-faith negotiation tactic and eliminating the list of presumptively good-faith tactics altogether, were among suggestions multichannel video programming distributors and MVPD allies had for the FCC on reforming retransmission consent negotiation rules. Some went beyond the list of practices the agency said it's considering as potential violations of good-faith negotiating. Meanwhile, broadcasters and their allies again said the retrans market doesn't require fixing.
Labeling prospective programming bundling as a bad-faith negotiation tactic and eliminating the list of presumptively good-faith tactics altogether, were among suggestions multichannel video programming distributors and MVPD allies had for the FCC on reforming retransmission consent negotiation rules. Some went beyond the list of practices the agency said it's considering as potential violations of good-faith negotiating. Meanwhile, broadcasters and their allies again said the retrans market doesn't require fixing.
Aviat and Fastback networks' waiver requests for smaller antenna use in the 71-76 and 81-86 GHz bands have gotten lots of support, and the sole opponent would keep those bands underutilized, the two companies said in FCC filings posted Monday and Tuesday (see here and here) in docket 15-244. The Wireless Bureau in October sought comment on the Aviat/Fastback proposals (see 1510130030). Monday was the deadline for replies.