NARUC and TracFone voiced serious concerns about an FCC draft order to revamp the Lifeline low-income USF support program outlined Tuesday (see 1603080024 and 1603080054). NARUC said a proposal to bypass states in designating Lifeline broadband providers would invite abuses. TracFone said proposed minimum standards would effectively require co-pays that many low-income consumers couldn't afford. Others, including Comcast, welcomed the Lifeline proposals. The cable company applauded the commission’s effort to modernize the program to support broadband and streamline administration.
State and federal regulators need to be focused on making broadband work, experts said during a National Regulatory Research Institute webinar Wednesday. The NRRI event expanded on a panel -- with the same participants -- held at a NARUC meeting in Washington last week (see 1602160004).
State and federal regulators need to be focused on making broadband work, experts said during a National Regulatory Research Institute webinar Wednesday. The NRRI event expanded on a panel -- with the same participants -- held at a NARUC meeting in Washington last week (see 1602160004).
With panels on some of the major telecom concerns, NARUC’s upcoming winter committee meetings will offer some robust discussion, commissioners told us in interviews Thursday. The telecom committee panels Feb. 14-17 coincide with some active proceedings at the FCC, as well, NARUC members said, with topics including Lifeline, carrier of last resort (COLR) and enabling competition in a broadband world, the agenda shows. FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai is expected to speak at a general session about the commission pre-empting state laws on municipal broadband, net neutrality and inmate calling.
With panels on some of the major telecom concerns, NARUC’s upcoming winter committee meetings will offer some robust discussion, commissioners told us in interviews Thursday. The telecom committee panels Feb. 14-17 coincide with some active proceedings at the FCC, as well, NARUC members said, with topics including Lifeline, carrier of last resort (COLR) and enabling competition in a broadband world, the agenda shows. FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai is expected to speak at a general session about the commission pre-empting state laws on municipal broadband, net neutrality and inmate calling.
The Telecom Act ushered in Internet innovation and growth even though it didn’t fully anticipate market developments, said some who helped draft the legislation that became law 20 years ago. Congress didn’t get all the details right, but the 1996 act created a strong competitive framework that was flexible enough to undergird huge investment in communications networks and Internet applications, panelists said at a Tuesday discussion hosted by the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy.
The Telecom Act ushered in Internet innovation and growth even though it didn’t fully anticipate market developments, said some who helped draft the legislation that became law 20 years ago. Congress didn’t get all the details right, but the 1996 act created a strong competitive framework that was flexible enough to undergird huge investment in communications networks and Internet applications, panelists said at a Tuesday discussion hosted by the Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy.
State officials want to promote mobile coverage and broadband deployment, said Lukas, Nace attorney David LaFuria at an FCBA panel Friday on state universal service issues. “They all have a desire to do something,” said LaFuria, who represents wireless carriers in FCC and state proceedings. He said some state regulators face statutory limitations but states could “regulate” broadband USF by following an FCC approach that combined “voluntary” industry acceptance of support with broadband conditions. States can help by removing regulatory barriers to broadband deployment, said Micah Caldwell, ITTA vice president-regulatory affairs. Jennifer Schneider, vice president-legislative affairs for Frontier Communications, said more states should reduce ILEC voice regulations, including carrier-of-last-resort (COLR) obligations.
State officials want to promote mobile coverage and broadband deployment, said Lukas, Nace attorney David LaFuria at an FCBA panel Friday on state universal service issues. “They all have a desire to do something,” said LaFuria, who represents wireless carriers in FCC and state proceedings. He said some state regulators face statutory limitations but states could “regulate” broadband USF by following an FCC approach that combined “voluntary” industry acceptance of support with broadband conditions. States can help by removing regulatory barriers to broadband deployment, said Micah Caldwell, ITTA vice president-regulatory affairs. Jennifer Schneider, vice president-legislative affairs for Frontier Communications, said more states should reduce ILEC voice regulations, including carrier-of-last-resort (COLR) obligations.
Net neutrality sparked familiar divisions but also some projections and legal analysis from attorneys on a Digital Policy Institute webinar Wednesday. While the FCC’s order faces many court challenges, Andrew Schwartzman, Georgetown Institute for Public Representation senior counselor, said he believes judges will likely focus on the commission’s authority to reclassify broadband as a Title II telecom service under the Communications Act and accord the agency’s view deference. But Brent Skorup, a George Mason University telecom research fellow, and Stuart Brotman, a University of Tennessee electronic media professor, questioned FCC deference in this case. Skorup suggested the commission was vulnerable on First Amendment grounds, but Schwartzman was skeptical. The three speakers did agree Congress is unlikely to pass a legislative compromise for now.