Discussing the need for a federal privacy law, Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter cited the “real tools” the FTC gained from the children’s privacy law: specific rulemaking and civil penalty authorities. Granted under the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, those tools have been debated this Congress (see 1810110043). Children should be at the center of the legislative debate, said Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., in a video address. Slaughter spoke Wednesday at the Georgetown Institute for Tech Law & Policy (see 1810220041) and at that day’s FTC hearing (see 1810230042).
Diminishing software copyright by overbroad applications of fair use or denial of protection would be a “step in the wrong direction,” Copyright Alliance CEO Keith Kupferschmid said Tuesday at an FTC hearing. The software industry would be forced to retrench to a closed model, no longer sharing code and instead relying on proprietary contracts to keep code protected, he said. He repeated his organization’s support for HR-3945, which would establish a voluntary small claims tribunal in the Copyright Office. Public Knowledge Policy Counsel Meredith Rose urged the FTC to collaborate with the Copyright Office on the overlap between copyright and competition, which increased with IoT technology. Hearings on copyright continue Wednesday (see 1810110056).
Diminishing software copyright by overbroad applications of fair use or denial of protection would be a “step in the wrong direction,” Copyright Alliance CEO Keith Kupferschmid said Tuesday at an FTC hearing. The software industry would be forced to retrench to a closed model, no longer sharing code and instead relying on proprietary contracts to keep code protected, he said. He repeated his organization’s support for HR-3945, which would establish a voluntary small claims tribunal in the Copyright Office. Public Knowledge Policy Counsel Meredith Rose urged the FTC to collaborate with the Copyright Office on the overlap between copyright and competition, which increased with IoT technology. Hearings on copyright continue Wednesday (see 1810110056).
Diminishing software copyright by overbroad applications of fair use or denial of protection would be a “step in the wrong direction,” Copyright Alliance CEO Keith Kupferschmid said Tuesday at an FTC hearing. The software industry would be forced to retrench to a closed model, no longer sharing code and instead relying on proprietary contracts to keep code protected, he said. He repeated his organization’s support for HR-3945, which would establish a voluntary small claims tribunal in the Copyright Office. Public Knowledge Policy Counsel Meredith Rose urged the FTC to collaborate with the Copyright Office on the overlap between copyright and competition, which increased with IoT technology. Hearings on copyright continue Wednesday (see 1810110056).
NTIA officials organized private meetings this summer with at least 14 different groups representing tech, telco and other industry interests to discuss the Trump administration’s privacy principles (see 1810100057), according to documents we obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. Of the 21 groups included in some 60 NTIA documents, four were consumer or privacy advocates. Industry representatives and a former senior-level FTC official defended the gatherings. Consumer groups said the process was skewed.
NTIA officials organized private meetings this summer with at least 14 different groups representing tech, telco and other industry interests to discuss the Trump administration’s privacy principles (see 1810100057), according to documents we obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. Of the 21 groups included in some 60 NTIA documents, four were consumer or privacy advocates. Industry representatives and a former senior-level FTC official defended the gatherings. Consumer groups said the process was skewed.
Big-tech acquisitions of startup competitors are harmful because startups usually deliver the “paradigm shifting innovations,” FTC staffer Lina Khan said at Wednesday’s competition policy hearing (see 1810160062). Antitrust enforcers should be wary of seemingly harmless acquisitions like Facebook’s 2013 buy of VPN provider Onavo, argued Khan, a staffer for Commissioner Rohit Chopra and fellow at Columbia University Law School. Onavo grants users heightened security, but it allows the social network to track in “extremely close detail” which rival apps are diverting attention from Facebook, she said. This allows the platform to detect which startups are the biggest competitive threat, shaping acquisition strategy and leading to purchases of apps like tbh and Moves, Khan said. These types of acquisition might not directly affect competition in the digital market, but they improve Facebook’s position and strengthen its leverage as incumbent, she said. It’s unclear how much competition is the right amount to produce a healthy amount of innovation, argued University of California-Berkeley economist Steven Tadelis. Companies need market power to reap the benefits of innovation, he said. Tadelis is convinced current antitrust tools guided by solid economic thinking are adequate, and each case should be evaluated on its own merits. Former FTC General Counsel Willard Tom, now at Morgan Lewis, agreed existing antitrust tools are adequate. Early stage entry is now extremely cheap and easy, given cost reductions with cloud computing, Tadelis said.
Big-tech acquisitions of startup competitors are harmful because startups usually deliver the “paradigm shifting innovations,” FTC staffer Lina Khan said at Wednesday’s competition policy hearing (see 1810160062). Antitrust enforcers should be wary of seemingly harmless acquisitions like Facebook’s 2013 buy of VPN provider Onavo, argued Khan, a staffer for Commissioner Rohit Chopra and fellow at Columbia University Law School. Onavo grants users heightened security, but it allows the social network to track in “extremely close detail” which rival apps are diverting attention from Facebook, she said. This allows the platform to detect which startups are the biggest competitive threat, shaping acquisition strategy and leading to purchases of apps like tbh and Moves, Khan said. These types of acquisition might not directly affect competition in the digital market, but they improve Facebook’s position and strengthen its leverage as incumbent, she said. It’s unclear how much competition is the right amount to produce a healthy amount of innovation, argued University of California-Berkeley economist Steven Tadelis. Companies need market power to reap the benefits of innovation, he said. Tadelis is convinced current antitrust tools guided by solid economic thinking are adequate, and each case should be evaluated on its own merits. Former FTC General Counsel Willard Tom, now at Morgan Lewis, agreed existing antitrust tools are adequate. Early stage entry is now extremely cheap and easy, given cost reductions with cloud computing, Tadelis said.
Antitrust action against Microsoft in the late 1990s enabled an explosion of innovation, allowing platforms like Google, Facebook and Amazon to solidify dominant positions, academics said Tuesday at FTC hearings (see 1810150052). Microsoft let companies use the internet as a development platform and expand using HTML protocol, said Columbia University Law School professor Tim Wu.
Antitrust action against Microsoft in the late 1990s enabled an explosion of innovation, allowing platforms like Google, Facebook and Amazon to solidify dominant positions, academics said Tuesday at FTC hearings (see 1810150052). Microsoft let companies use the internet as a development platform and expand using HTML protocol, said Columbia University Law School professor Tim Wu.