Dropbox CEO Drew Houston praised Congress for working on legislation that would curb abusive patent litigation. Houston said during a Tuesday session at the State of the Net conference that bills like the Innovation Act (HR-3309), which passed the House in December, are a good step toward removing what he called a “tax” on innovation. Dropbox has been sued by nonpracticing entities -- something that Houston said is now essentially a “rite of passage” for tech companies. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., who authored HR-3309, praised the House for passing the bill, saying the White House had supported its passage. The Senate is still considering legislation on patent litigation abuse, including the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act (S-1720). Houston also urged Congress to enact legislation to create a single national standard for addressing data breaches, which he said would be an improvement over what he called a “patchwork of standards” at the state level.
The year 2014 “may well be a watershed year for the multistakeholder model of Internet policy making,” and the U.S. plans to continue to continue defending the model while encouraging it to evolve, said NTIA Administrator Larry Strickling during a speech Tuesday. Strickling and U.S. Coordinator for International Communications and Information Policy Daniel Sepulveda said at the State of the Net conference that multistakeholder bodies that have governed Internet processes need to evolve to become more inclusive of stakeholders in the developing world.
Net neutrality advocates said the best way for the FCC to reinstate a nondiscrimination rule for broadband ISPs -- akin to the rule the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit just struck down -- was to reclassify broadband Internet as a Title II service. Reclassification is one of several options the FCC could take to regroup on net neutrality following the D.C. Circuit’s Tuesday ruling (WID Jan 15 p1), though other non-prescriptive measures could also work, the advocates and other industry experts said Friday during a Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee event.
Net neutrality advocates said the best way for the FCC to reinstate a nondiscrimination rule for broadband ISPs -- akin to the rule the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit just struck down -- was to reclassify broadband Internet as a Title II service. Reclassification is one of several options the FCC could take to regroup on net neutrality following the D.C. Circuit’s Tuesday ruling (WID Jan 15 p1), though other non-prescriptive measures could also work, the advocates and other industry experts said Friday during a Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee event.
The House Cybersecurity Subcommittee cleared the National Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Protection Act Wednesday, sending HR-3696 on to the full House Homeland Security Committee. The bill, which had the support of both Republican and Democratic committee leaders, would codify the Department of Homeland Security’s existing public-private collaboration on cybersecurity, but would not give the agency new powers. It would also allow new liability protections for companies that deploy anti-terrorism technology to also deploy cybersecurity tech. The subcommittee cleared HR-3696 with multiple amendments, including two that dealt with concerns stemming from recent data breaches at Target and other national retailers.
The House Cybersecurity Subcommittee cleared the National Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Protection Act Wednesday, sending HR-3696 on to the full House Homeland Security Committee. The bill, which had the support of both Republican and Democratic committee leaders, would codify the Department of Homeland Security’s existing public-private collaboration on cybersecurity, but would not give the agency new powers. It would also allow new liability protections for companies that deploy anti-terrorism technology to also deploy cybersecurity tech. The subcommittee cleared HR-3696 with multiple amendments, including two that dealt with concerns stemming from recent data breaches at Target (WID Jan 13 p4) and other national retailers.
Top U.S. wireless carriers Verizon Wireless and AT&T told the FCC it should move forward with its original proposal to license the 600 MHz band and AWS-3 spectrum based on Economic Areas, rather than adopt the Competitive Carriers Association’s alternate proposal to license the spectrum based on Partial Economic Areas (PEAs). The PEAs, as proposed by CCA, would essentially be a subdivision of EAs and would be based on EA and Cellular Market Areas (CMA). The FCC had sought public input on the CCA proposal, which also has support from other rural carriers, and comments were posted online Thursday and Friday.
Capitol Hill reaction may be limited, despite criticism AT&T is facing from net neutrality advocates over the introduction Monday of the carrier’s “sponsored data” plan, said industry experts in interviews. Other national carriers are likely monitoring the criticism from advocacy groups and the Hill and may use that to determine when -- and if -- they will introduce similar plans, the experts said. Net neutrality advocates said the plan violates the spirit of net neutrality but question the extent to which the FCC’s Open Internet rules would apply (WID Jan 7 p1). House Communications Subcommittee ranking member Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., raised some concerns Monday about the AT&T plan, which she said in a statement “puts it in the business of picking winners and losers on the Internet, threatening the open Internet, competition and consumer choice."
Capitol Hill reaction may be limited, despite criticism AT&T is facing from net neutrality advocates over the introduction Monday of the carrier’s “sponsored data” plan, said industry experts in interviews. Other national carriers are likely monitoring the criticism from advocacy groups and the Hill and may use that to determine when -- and if -- they will introduce similar plans, the experts said. Net neutrality advocates said the plan violates the spirit of net neutrality but question the extent to which the FCC’s Open Internet rules would apply (CD Jan 7 p2). House Communications Subcommittee ranking member Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., raised some concerns Monday about the AT&T plan, which she said in a statement “puts it in the business of picking winners and losers on the Internet, threatening the open Internet, competition and consumer choice."
The FCC should let network operators decide the best way to mitigate interference on the 3.5 GHz band, said a carrier, high-technology firms and other companies commenting on spectrum access systems for use on the 3550-3650 MHz band. SAS shouldn’t “directly control different aspects of the network,” T-Mobile said Monday (http://bit.ly/1ddo1fJ). Google and Microsoft also filed papers with the FCC on the technical aspects of the SAS in advance of a Jan. 14 workshop being hosted by the Wireless Bureau and the Office of Engineering and Technology. The FCC has targeted the band for shared commercial use.