Fleet Tracking Device Shouldn't Be Dutiable as 'Radio Navigational Aid', Importer Says
Importer Geotab said in a Sept. 30 complaint that its "GO Devices" -- used for “vehicle tracking and telematics” -- should've been classified as “other apparatus for the transmission or reception of voice, images or other data,” not “radio navigational aid apparatus.” As a result, they should have been liquidated under Harmonized Tariff Schedule heading 8517, which provides for a 7.5% Section 301 duty on Chinese-origin products, not heading 8526, which carries a 25% Section 301 duty (Geotab Inc. v. United States, CIT # 23-00185).
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
The device is installed into vehicles so that companies can monitor their fleets, Geotab said. In its complaint, the importer said that heading 8517 is a principal use provision and that, applying the usual Carborundum factors, the GO Devices fall under it. Alternatively, it said, the heading applies based on HTS Section 16’s Note 4, which locates machines made up of individual components that are “intended to contribute together to a clearly defined function covered by one of the headings in Chapter 84 or Chapter 85” in that particular heading.
The importer also said the product can’t be used as a radio navigational aid because it doesn’t have a screen or user controls.