Rocket Presses for Reconsideration of Court’s Denial of Its Motion to Compel
Michael Dahdah’s Dec. 22 opposition to defendant Rocket Mortgage's motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying the company’s motion to compel the plaintiff’s Telephone Consumer Protection Act claims to arbitration (see 2312270013) “fails to undercut” Rocket’s showing that reconsideration…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
“is warranted here,” said Rocket’s reply memorandum Monday (docket 4:22-cv-11863) in U.S. District Court for Eastern Michigan in Flint. Dahdah’s opposition “effectively concedes” that the court’s order “misapplied the law and the facts” in denying the motion to compel, said the memorandum. Dahdah’s argument rests on a “misstatement” of the court’s holding, which actually denied the motion to compel “based on finding a dispute of facts,” it said. The plaintiff also is wrong that Rocket “has somehow waived its right to arbitration,” it said.