1 Opposition, Potential Tagalong Actions, Transfer Notices Filed in MOVEit MDL
New filings before the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Legislation in In Re MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation Monday included notices of six potential tagalong actions, filing of conditional transfer order 5 (CTO-5), and a notice of opposition to…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
CTO-1 by plaintiff Fortuno Jeanfort (docket 3083) in a negligence class action against TD Ameritrade. Defendants Charles Schwab and TD Ameritrade notified the panel of three potential tagalong cases in U.S. District Court for Nebraska: David Schultz v. TD Ameritrade (docket 23-cv-00375), Keren Jeanfort v. TD Ameritrade (docket 23-cv-00380) and Francis Grande v. TD Ameritrade (docket 23-cv-00385). Actions listed on CTO-5 -- Little v. American National Insurance and Matthews v. American National Group -- appear to involve questions of fact common to the actions previously transferred to the District of Massachusetts in Boston and assigned to U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs, said the panel. Since five actions in In Re MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation were transferred to the Massachusetts court Oct. 4, 64 additional actions have been transferred to the district, the JPML said. In addition, defendant CareSource filed a notice of three additional potential tagalong cases against defendant CareSource in Ohio district courts.