Equity Firm Calls AT&T’s Racial Bias ‘Prime Example’ of Section 1981 Violation
The case in which private equity firm Legacy Equity Advisors accuses AT&T of not viewing it as a serious or qualified buyer for AT&T’s divested assets because of its African American ownership and management “is a prime example of racial…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
discrimination in contracting” that Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act “was intended to eradicate,” said Legacy’s opposition Monday (docket 3:23-cv-00979) in U.S. District Court for Northern Texas in Dallas to AT&T’s July 17 motion to dismiss (see 2307180002). In trying to “detract” from Legacy’s allegations, AT&T’s motion “makes a series of arguments contrary to” 5th Circuit precedent, said the opposition. Legacy alleges AT&T shut it out from bidding on Cricket Wireless, “only further evincing AT&T’s discriminatory intent,” it said. “The refusal to allow a bid, if on account of race, is a violation of Section 1981,” it said. AT&T contends Legacy’s complaint is time-barred, it said. But a court “may not dismiss a complaint based on the statute of limitations, unless it is evident from the plaintiff's pleadings that the action is time-barred, and the pleadings fail to raise some basis for tolling,” it said. Here, the complaint isn’t time-barred based on the allegations that Legacy didn’t know, and didn’t have reason to know, of AT&T’s “discriminatory motive” until March 2022, it said.