4 Parties Move To Consolidate Class Actions Against Carnival
Parties in four privacy class actions alleging Carnival’s website violates the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) jointly moved Thursday to consolidate the related actions and set case deadlines, said a filing (docket 3:23-cv-00404) in U.S. District Court for Southern…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
California in San Diego. The related actions pending in Southern California district court are India Price v. Carnival Corp. (docket 3:23-cv-00236), Erica Mikulsky v. Carnival, (docket 3:23-cv-00404), Marilyn Hernandez v. Carnival (docket 3:23-cv-01034) and Ariel Oliver v. Carnival, (docket 3:23-cv-01036). A fifth case brought by Daniel Rubridge in U.S. District Court for Massachusetts has been stipulated for a transfer to the Southern California federal court but the order hasn’t been entered, said the filing. The plaintiffs allege Carnival’s use of session replay software on its website violates state and federal wiretapping prohibitions. Carnival asked Wednesday that Mikulsky’s class action be related to U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel and related to Price because they both involve alleged CIPA violations (see 2306070003).