Plaintiff Opposes Meta's Motion for Court Ruling on Pending Motion to Sever
Plaintiff Jane Doe opposes Meta’s administrative motion asking the court to rule on its pending motion to sever (see 2305090042), said her Tuesday response (docket 3:23-cv-00059) in U.S. District Court for Northern California in San Francisco. Meta requested a ruling…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
on its pending motion to sever claims in the Meta pixel case after co-defendant Hey Favor’s April 18 bankruptcy filing (see 2304280021) and an automatic stay of proceedings. The case is one of several involving healthcare providers’ use of the Meta Pixel tracking tool on their websites for targeted advertising. “Meta omits that since this Motion was fully briefed it has taken inconsistent positions on several significant issues” in Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation (docket 3:22-cv-03580), said Doe. Meta’s “opportunistically limited view” of the hospital actions in Healthcare Litigation “directly contradicts its previous argument that the claims against it in this action must be severed because they are completely ‘duplicative of -- and encompassed within – the claims asserted in the [Hospital Actions,]” it said.