Trade Court Consolidates 3 Challenges to ITC, Commerce Investigations on OCTG
The Court of International Trade in a March 3 order consolidated three actions challenging the International Trade Commission's final determination in the injury investigation on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Argentina, Mexico, Russia and South Korea and related investigations…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
by the Commerce Department (Tenaris Bay City, et al. v. United States, CIT Consol. # 22-00344). The cases, brought by Tenairs Bay City, Maverick Tube, Ipsco Tubulars, Tenaris Global Services and Siderca, argued, among other things, that the ITC improperly cumulated imports from the four countries despite evidence that Mexican and Argentinian OCTG had different uses, were sold to different users and did not compete with Russian and South Korean OCTG (see 2301180047). The plaintiffs also claimed that Commerce incorrectly evaluated industry support calculations by the antidumping and countervailing duty petitioners.