Court Holds Muttontown Intervenors’ Motions in Abeyance in AT&T Case
U.S. Magistrate Judge Lee Dunst for Eastern New York in Central Islip entered a text-only order Wednesday (docket 2:22-cv-05524) holding in abeyance the two motions to intervene in AT&T’s cell tower dispute with the village of Muttontown until District Judge…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
Joanna Seybert’s decision on the village’s anticipated motion to dismiss. Dunst ordered the parties to file a joint report by Feb. 17 informing the court whether they will request a stay on discovery in light of the motion to dismiss. AT&T is suing to force Muttontown to approve construction of a 150-foot cell tower to remedy an allegedly significant service gap (see 2301200043). Before the court are two motions to intervene from about 30 village residents seeking to block the tower for fear it will damage their property values and aesthetics.