NCTA Defends FCC, USF in Consumers' Research Amicus Brief
A court ruling striking down USF and the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund would significantly harm millions of people and businesses and threaten the operations and investments of cable operators, NCTA told the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in an…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
amicus brief Monday supporting the FCC in Consumer’s Research v. FCC (docket 21-3886). Consumers' Research argued the funding mechanism for the Universal Service Fund violates the U.S. Constitution by delegating tax responsibilities reserved for Congress (see 2212130069). “The tremendous real-world stakes of this case should give this Court pause before entertaining Petitioners’ unprecedented non-delegation theory,” NCTA said. Ending RDOF would threaten internet connectivity across the country and strand investments in broadband infrastructure expansion “without any ability to recover the considerable resources operators have poured into these projects,” NCTA said. “Petitioners fail to give the Court any compelling reason to cut off consumers from their services, upend cable operators’ customer relationships, and disrupt the major investments cable operators have already made in reliance on USF support,” said the filing. Creating a separate funding entity to manage universal access to telecommunications is a common practice internationally and in line with International Telecommunications Union best practices, said Penn State Law Professor Robert Frieden in a separate amicus brief. Having a separate organization, “promotes greater transparency, accountability, and efficiency in the collection and disbursements of funds,” Frieden said.