Justice Thomas Suggests 'Brand X' is Unconstitutional
Dissenting to a denial of a petition for writ of certiorari to the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Monday, a Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas suggested an earlier Brand X ruling upholding an FCC decision to keep cable modem…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
service unregulated may be unconstitutional. "Although I authored Brand X, it is never too late" to surrender former views to a better-considered position, Thomas said. He added Brand X appears to be inconsistent with the Constitution, the Administrative Procedure Act and traditional tools of statutory interpretation. The justice was writing about an unrelated case that's not about net neutrality. "I don't see this as changing the outlook for net neutrality in the Supreme Court one way or the other," emailed Andrew Schwartzman, senior counselor for the Benton Institute for Broadband & Society. "Thomas' position on this has been expressed in the past, so what he said here doesn't change that." The FCC didn't comment. NCTA declined comment.