GM Pulls RTT Waiver After Speaking With Disability Group Opponents
General Motors petitioned the FCC to OK the automaker's new request to yank its petition that sought a partial waiver on providing real-time texting functions (see 1812260053). The new ask came after speaking with a lawyer for disability group commenters…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
that opposed the waiver. GM now called itself "deeply grateful to Telecommunications for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing" Inc. (TDI) and "corresponding groups" for "their thoughtful submission, which questioned the necessity of the Petition." The discussion "helped lead GM to agree that the Petition is not necessary," said the motion posted Thursday in docket 15-178. "Once available to the general public, the Cruise AV in-vehicle customer support function would provide non-interoperable RTT-to-RTT communication (as between AV riders and customer support personnel); non-interoperable transmission and receipt of RTT communication from public safety entities (with immediate intervention and assistance from customer support personnel), and non-interoperable simultaneous voice and RTT communication (as between AV passengers and customer support personnel)." Passengers can use smartphones for "interoperable communication," so the automaker doesn't need the waiver, it said. It cited "the in-vehicle service button or accessible devices" giving "blind, low-vision, deaf, and hearing-impaired passengers" always-on communications. GM noted RTT rules don't apply to the company's Cruise autonomous vehicles being tested in Detroit, Phoenix and San Francisco "because the vehicles will offer a non-interoperable, non-interconnected telematics service rather than interoperable, interconnected communication." Led by TDI, more than a dozen groups had opposed GM's ask as "either unnecessary or unwarranted, depending on a critical ambiguity in the petition." The Hearing Loss Association of America, National Association of the Deaf, Paralyzed Veterans of America and other groups' comments ask the FCC to consider "broader issues" of IoT "accessibility and 911 access implicated" here. A GM lawyer and the FCC declined to comment. TDI's lawyer praised GM's withdrawal request.