Tariff 'Escalation' Impact ‘Unambiguously Severe’ on Tech Sector, Says Analyst
The American information and communications technology (ICT) sector is bearing an especially heavy burden from the “bilateral tariff escalation” between the U.S. and China, Rhodium Group Senior Analyst Lauren Gloudeman told reporters on a conference call, summarizing the findings of a Rhodium report for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (see 1903140001). For the report, released Friday, Rhodium did a "quantitative assessment" of the escalation's costs and found the impact is “unambiguously severe” on the ICT industry, she said.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
The Trump administration’s Section 301 tariffs “raised prices for nearly one-third of ICT imports from China, which is equivalent to nearly 20 percent of the ICT imports around the world,” said Gloudeman. “What we found in some ways isn’t surprising,” she said. “Bilateral tariffs result in lower GDP, employment, investment and trade flows” for the U.S., plus diminished “consumer welfare,” she said Friday. “We see higher import and export prices, meaning higher costs for consumers and businesses.” The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative didn't comment Monday.
Rhodium said long-term ICT “productivity growth” is at risk through lower U.S. “competitiveness” and production stagnation, said Gloudeman. “Our headline takeaway was that U.S. GDP would cumulatively face $1 trillion in losses within 10 years across all tariff-escalation scenarios that we modeled,” she said. “We’re talking about a range of $64 billion to $91 billion per year on average in the first five years.”
As China and the U.S. “suffer the biggest hits in their potential GDP from bilateral tariff escalation, the rest of the world actually benefits from diverted trade and investment,” said Gloudeman. Rhodium sees much of the ICT production activity diverting to “regional supply chains,” especially in Canada and Mexico, and East Asia “to a lesser extent,” she said.
Though the report forecasts a 3-4 percent annual increase in domestic U.S. ICT production, “we do not consider this as a wide-scale onshoring” of manufacturing, said Gloudeman. “The reality is that import tariffs produce import competition for a number of industries,” including ICT, she said. China and the U.S. also stand to “lose the most” in ICT exports, “which broadly shift” to Taiwan, Hong Kong and Mexico, she said.
Tariffs will “disproportionately hit intermediate goods” the most, said Gloudeman. That has “stronger implications” for sectors that are more heavily “reliant” than others on imported “inputs for manufacturing,” she said. The impact on the ICT sector is “amplified for that very reason,” she said. “We also see, outside of the models, that tariffs undermine the critical role that U.S. ICT services play in facilitating all trade, not just ICT trade.”
The “structure” of globalized ICT supply chains “suggests that the more a given industry relies on processing and assembly in China, the more it will be impacted by the tariffs,” said the report. That’s not just because U.S.-based manufacturers rely on lower-cost intermediate goods from China, “or because U.S. consumers use final ICT goods assembled in or exported from China,” it said.
U.S. tariffs “concentrated in” ICT goods “will punish not just Chinese exporters, but also U.S. suppliers based in China,” said the report. It cited the huge upsurge in “U.S. assets built out in China” in the past two decades.” U.S. “multinational enterprises,” including those with direct Chinese subsidiaries, are today a “key link in the bilateral supply chain,” it said.