Importers Should Calculate Bond Increases to Avoid Another Insufficiency Notice, Surety Executive Says
PALM SPRINGS, Calif. -- Piecemeal bond increases to satisfy CBP insufficiency notices won’t be enough to dig importers out of the hole created by recently imposed sections 232 and 301 tariffs on aluminum and steel and products from China, respectively,…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
said Dave Jordan of Roanoke Trade on Oct. 20. While CBP looks at duties paid over the past 12 months to set bond requirements, importers have likely seen their duty liability spike in the past few months since the tariffs were imposed, and will “probably end up with an insufficiency letter again in a few months” as more time passes with the tariffs in effect, he said, speaking at the Western Cargo Conference. Importers should do their own calculations, taking the month with the highest amount of duties paid, multiplying that by 12 months and setting a bond at 10 percent of that amount. For example, an importer that averaged $500,000 in duties paid over the last two months should extrapolate that to $6 million over the year and get a bond for $600,000. Some importers' products covered by multiple trade remedies could see bond requirements rise substantially, Jordan said. One of his clients, an importer of solar panels subject to Section 201 safeguards and Section 301 tariffs, started with an $800,000 bond that’s now up to $11 million, he said. CBP has urged importers to be “proactive” in setting their bond amounts (see 1808210029), given the recent spike in insufficiency notices (see 1807260011).