CPA Celebrates Coming Section 301 Tariffs
The planned Section 301 tariffs on $50 billion in goods from China are "decades overdue," said Coalition for a Prosperous America Chairman Dan DiMicco in a news release on the White House announcement that the tariffs will go forward (see 1805290024). "We appreciate that President Trump is now making clear that the age of appeasement for China’s trade cheating is at an end," DiMicco said.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
The U.S. chemicals industry would be hit hard as a result of Section 301 tariffs, the American Chemistry Council said in a news release. "While five percent of the 1,333 products the [Office of the U.S. Trade Representative] has identified for a 25 percent tariff relate to chemicals, the effects of the full list of tariffs are likely to be felt well beyond the business of chemistry," ACC Director of International Trade Ed Brzytwa said. "If applied, these duties will invite damaging retaliation and advantage China’s growing industry at the expense of American production and workers. We anticipate significant disruptions to supply chain operations, offshoring of production, and termination of production altogether due [to] the sudden, uneven playing field that tariffs would create in the global marketplace."
The risks are amplified by China's likely response to the tariffs, Brzytwa said. “China’s retaliatory tariffs would hit the U.S. chemicals industry, not once, but twice, by closing the China market both to our exports and to exports of products using chemicals in their production, including agricultural goods and autos," he said. "The tariffs on downstream products will lead to less demand for those products and therefore less demand for U.S.-made chemicals." The American Soybean Association also voiced concern in a statement.