Public Knowledge, EFF, CFA Back FilmOn X in Court
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals should rule that streaming video service FilmOn X is entitled to a compulsory license under the Copyright Act, said amicus briefs from the Consumer Federation of America, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the National…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
Federation of the Blind and Public Knowledge. Section 111 of the Copyright Act, which governs such licenses, was intended by Congress to be technology neutral, Public Knowledge and the EFF said in a joint filing. Without a compulsory license and the accompanying right to retransmit broadcast content, a streaming service like FilmOn X can't be financially viable, the NFB said. If an FCC proposal to reclassify services like FilmOn X as multichannel video programming distributors comes to fruition, the new over-the-top MVPDs would have to comply with FCC rules requiring video description of their content, which would in turn be a great expansion of the online video that's accessible to the blind, NFB said. The 9th Circuit should find that FilmOn X is entitled to a statutory license because it would expand choice for all consumers, CFA said. Cable is now an incumbent in the video industry, and without the content granted by a compulsory license OTT carriers cannot compete, CFA said.