FCC Presses D.C. Circuit To Hold AT&T USF Voice Duty Challenge in Abeyance
The FCC urged a federal court to put off consideration of an AT&T challenge to a December commission order on price-cap telco USF obligations, pending further regulatory action on related issues in other proceedings. Granting an FCC motion to hold…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
the case in abeyance will allow regulators to address the issues raised by AT&T, which could obviate the need for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to adjudicate the case, or at least may alter its review, the agency said in a reply to the court on its motion in AT&T v. FCC, No. 15-1038. AT&T opposed the motion and said there was no reason for delay. The D.C. Circuit recently suspended its briefing schedule in the case while it considers the FCC motion (see 1507160032). AT&T is challenging the December order because, among other things, it relieved price-cap carriers of only some statewide USF obligations -- not all, as AT&T requested -- to provide voice support in high-cost areas where they would no longer be subsidized under the FCC's broadband-oriented Connect America Fund Phase II overhaul. The FCC said it had made "unequivocal statements that it has yet to decide any of the issues" underlying AT&T's challenge. "The FCC has not yet taken any final, reviewable action relevant to this case," the agency said. The commission noted its Wireline Bureau issued a public notice Thursday listing census blocks where price-cap telcos still have federal high-cost voice duties and seeking comment on related pending issues in various proceedings. The FCC also noted it has a Jan. 4 statutory deadline to finish a proceeding in which it is "actively considering the arguments at issue here." The D.C. Circuit should reject AT&T's attempt to "bypass ordinary administrative procedures and involve the Court in agency decisionmaking that is not yet complete," the agency said.