Brookings Fellow Points Finger at Intelligence Community for OPM Breach
After reports the intelligence community was resistant to integrate its systems with those operated by the Office of Personnel Management’s (OPM) due to security concerns before recent breaches at OPM occurred, Brookings Institution Senior Fellow in Government Studies Benjamin Wittes…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
questioned in a blog post Tuesday why “nobody in the intelligence community bothered, it seems, to help secure OPM’s systems.” If the Director of National Intelligence’s office thought the data OPM managed wasn't secure, why not secure those systems, Wittes asked. Though he says OPM isn’t without fault, “identifying intelligence targets in the federal government and securing them against professional intelligence adversaries is really the job of others in the federal government, and at least some of those others had their eyes on this problem,” he said. “The more I think about it, the less I think it makes sense to blame OPM for the failure here, and the more I think the intelligence community itself must take responsibility for it -- particularly for any portions of the breach or breaches that involve data for security clearance background checks,” Wittes said. The Office of the DNI didn't comment.